ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020
The Neural Basis for Response Latency in a Sensory-Motor Behavior.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complex Sound Discrimination in Zebrafish: Auditory Learning Within a Novel "Go/Go" Decision-Making Paradigm.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Comparing the performance of beamformer algorithms in estimating orientations of neural sources.iScience · 2024Article
- Bioelectricity in dental medicine: a narrative review.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Review
- Prior expectation enhances sensorimotor behavior by modulating population tuning and subspace activity in sensory cortex.Science advances · 2023Article
- The effect of temporal expectation on the correlations of frontal neural activity with alpha oscillation and sensory-motor latency.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Latency correction in sparse neuronal spike trains.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2022Article
- Tether-free photothermal deep-brain stimulation in freely behaving mice via wide-field illumination in the near-infrared-II window.Nature biomedical engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We seek a neural circuit explanation for sensory-motor reaction times. In the smooth eye movement region of the frontal eye fields (FEFSEM), the latencies of pairs of neurons show trial-by-trial correlations that cause trial-by-trial correlations in neural and behavioral latency. These correlations can account for two-third of the observed variation in behavioral latency. The amplitude of preparatory activity also could contribute, but the responses of many FEFSEM neurons fail to support predictions of the traditional "ramp-to-threshold" model. As a correlate of neural processing that determines reaction time, the local field potential in FEFSEM includes a brief wave in the 5-15-Hz frequency range that precedes pursuit initiation and whose phase is correlated with the latency of pursuit in individual trials. We suggest that the latency of the incoming visual motion signals combines with the state of preparatory activity to determine the latency of the transient response that controls eye movement. IMPACT STATEMENT: The motor cortex for smooth pursuit eye movements contributes to sensory-motor reaction time through the amplitude of preparatory activity and the latency of transient, visually driven responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.