Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31828247›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2019

Contribution of Capillary Refilling Time and Skin Mottling Score to Predict ICU Admission of Patients with Septic or haemorrhagic Shock Admitted to the Emergency Department: A TRCMARBSAU Study.

Romain Jouffroy, Emmanuel Bloch-Laine, Maxime Maignan, Pierrick Le Borgne, Nicolas Marjanovic, Thomas Lafon, Scarlett Dehdar, Lea Thomas, Pierre Michelet, Benoit Vivien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Molecular mechanisms in septic shock (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Romain JouffroyIntensive Care Unit, Anaesthesiology, SAMU, Necker Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3916-497X
Emmanuel Bloch-LaineDepartment of Emergency, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2114-3716
Maxime MaignanDepartment of Emergency and SAMU, Grenoble Alps University Hospital, Grenoble; Department of Emergency, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4301-4213
Pierrick Le BorgneINSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), UMR 1260, Regenerative NanoMedicine (RNM), Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle (FMTS), University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9141-6439
Nicolas MarjanovicDepartment of Emergency and SAMU, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1733-1175
Thomas LafonDepartment of Emergency, SAMU, Inserm CIC 1435, Limoges University Hospital Center, Limoges, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-8107
Scarlett DehdarDepartment of Emergency, Argenteuil Hospital, Argenteuil, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8281-9260
Lea ThomasDepartment of Emergency, Begin Military Hospital, Clamart, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-573X
Pierre MicheletDepartment of Emergency, Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille University - CV2N, INSERM, INRA, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1233-713X
Benoit VivienIntensive Care Unit, Anaesthesiology, SAMU, Necker Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-5842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the emergency department (ED), the severity assessment of shock is a fundamental step prior to the admission in the intensive care unit (ICU). As biomarkers are time consuming to evaluate the severity of micro- and macro-circulation alteration, capillary refill time and skin mottling score are two simple, available clinical criteria validated to predict mortality in the ICU. The aim of the present study is to provide clinical evidence that capillary refill time and skin mottling score assessed in the ED also predict ICU admission of patients with septic or haemorrhagic shock.

methodsThis trial is an observational, non-randomised controlled study. A total of 1500 patients admitted to the ED for septic or haemorrhagic shock will be enrolled into the study. The primary outcome is the admission to the ICU.

resultsThe study will not impact the treatments provided to each patient. Capillary refill time and skin mottling score will not be taken into account to decide patient's treatments and/or ICU admission. Patients will be followed up during their hospital stay to determine their precise destination after the ED (home, ICU or ward) and the 28- and 90-day mortality after hospital admission.

conclusionThe results from the present study will provide clinical evidence on the correlation between the ICU admission and the capillary refill time and the skin mottling score in septic or haemorrhagic shock admitted to the ED. The aim of the present study is to provide two simple, reliable and non-invasive tools for the triage and early orientation of these patients.

Indexed as

Capillary refill timeemergencyintensive care unitpredictionskin mottling score

Identifiers

PMID31828247
PMCPMC6886826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.