ArticleEndoscopy international open2019
Novel hemostatic adhesive powder for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06188585 (Randomized Controlled Multi-Center Non-Inferiority Trial of UI-EWD), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Multi-Center Non-Inferiority Trial of UI-EWD (Nexpowder™) vs. Conventional Treatment as First-Line Endoscopic Therapy for Patients With High-Risk Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding (TREET)
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Nexpowder in Reducing Post-ESD Coagulation Syndrome in Proximal Colon Lesions: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Precise and optimal delivery techniques of hemostatic powders in gastrointestinal bleeding.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Endoscopic Management of Malignancy-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prevention of Delayed Bleeding after Endoscopic Resection using Gel Hemostatic Powder: A Multicentric Open-lapel Prospective Study.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- [Emerging Diagnostic Techniques and Therapies for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Review
- Efficacy and applications for PuraStatWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Novel hemostatic adhesive powder to prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the GI tract: first U.S. multicenter experience.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024Article
- Current status and clinical outcome of endoscopic hemostatic powder in gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective multicenter study.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- [Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024Review
- Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Duodenal and Ampullary Adenomas.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2023Review
- Hemostatic Effect and Mechanism of Epidermal Growth Factor-Hemostatic Powder after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Porcine Model.Gut and liver · 2023Article
- Topical hemostatic agents in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Hemostatic Powders in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: The Open Questions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Hemostatic powders for gastrointestinal bleeding: a review of old, new, and emerging agents in a rapidly advancing field.Endoscopy international open · 2022Review
- Hemostatic efficacy and safety of the hemostatic powder UI-EWD in patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Propensity score matching analysis to evaluate efficacy of polyethylene oxide adhesive on preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Efficacy of a novel hemostatic adhesive powder in patients with upper gastrointestinal tumor bleeding.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.