ArticleCureus2019
Elective Neck Dissection, but Not Adjuvant Radiation Therapy, Improves Survival in Stage I and II Oral Tongue Cancer with Depth of Invasion >4 mm.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Oral Cavity Cancer With Minor Adverse Features; A Single Institute Experience.Head & neck · 2025Article
- Tumor-host interface in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Impact on nodal metastasis and prognosis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
- Depth of invasion versus tumour thickness in early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: which measurement is the most practical and predictive of outcome?Histopathology · 2021Article
- Staging more important than grading? Evaluation of malignancy grading, depth of invasion, and resection margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Article
- Transcriptome analysis of tongue cancer based on high‑throughput sequencing.Oncology reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose/objective(s) In early-stage, node negative oral tongue cancer, there is limited data supporting tumor depth of invasion (DOI) as an indication for post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) to the primary site. The primary aim of this study is to examine the effect of tumor DOI and PORT on overall survival (OS). Materials and methods The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to query patients with AJCC stage I and II oral tongue cancer (2006-2013). Patients were stratified by receipt of PORT, elective neck dissection (ND), and DOI (≤4 mm or >4 mm). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare OS (using the log-rank test) between PORT versus no-PORT. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model performed to evaluate the independent effect of PORT and neck dissection on OS. Results Among 939 patients, 69.3% were clinical stage I, 67.4% received ND, 23.4% had DOI >4 mm, and 10.4% received PORT. The addition of PORT did not improve OS with tumor DOI ≤4 mm (p = 0.634) or >4 mm (p = 0.816). The addition of elective neck dissection improved OS for DOI >4 mm (p = 0.010), but not for ≤4 mm (p = 0.128). On multivariable analysis, ND improved OS if DOI >4 mm (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.81 [p = .012]), when also controlling for age, sex, PORT status, clinical stage, and pathological stage. Conclusion Tumor DOI should not be used as a sole indication for PORT in early stage oral tongue cancers. Elective neck dissection at the time of excision of the primary tumor results in higher OS for tumors with DOI >4 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.