Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31827979›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2019

Jagannath Padmanabhan, Zeshaan N Maan, Sun Hyung Kwon, Revanth Kosaraju, Clark A Bonham, Geoffrey C Gurtner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Tools of the trade: leveraging 3DFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PersonalizedJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  7. Dual optical elastography detectsJournal of biomedical optics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Collagen Fibril Orientation Instructs Fibroblast Differentiation Via Cell Contractility.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Prevalence of scars: an international epidemiological survey in adults.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jagannath PadmanabhanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Zeshaan N MaanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Sun Hyung KwonDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Revanth KosarajuDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Clark A BonhamDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Geoffrey C GurtnerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

animal modelburnfibrosisforeign body reactionhypertrophic scarscar

Identifiers

PMID31827979
PMCPMC6904938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.