Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31827920›Full record

ArticleCardiology research and practice2019

The Effect of Ivabradine on the Human Atrial Myocardial Contractility in an

Ryan Chaban, Katja Buschmann, Anna Krausgrill, Andres Beiras-Fernandez, Christian-Friedrich Vahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. No evidence for pericardial restraint in the snapping turtle (American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan ChabanDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0484-8362
Katja BuschmannDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Anna KrausgrillDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Andres Beiras-FernandezDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5689-1103
Christian-Friedrich VahlDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIvabradine has emerged as a new antiarrhythmic agent that could compete with the traditional ones, such as

methodsMyocardial tissues from the right atrial appendages of patients undergoing cardiac surgery were dissected to obtain 40 specimens from 20 patients (length: 3 mm), which were exposed to electrical impulses at a frequency of 75 bpm for 30 min to reach a steady state. Specimens were then categorised into four groups (each including five patients). The first group was the control, whereas the second, third, and fourth were treated with 60 nM, 200 nM, and 2

resultsIvabradine has affected the force of contraction significantly

conclusionsIvabradine did not interfere with the contractile behaviour of human atrial tissue when it was used in therapeutic dosages in

Identifiers

PMID31827920
PMCPMC6885252
OpenAlexW2982416405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.