ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2019
An institution-wide faculty mentoring program at an academic health center with 6-year prospective outcome data.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mentoring across differences: Introducing hidden curriculum competencies for scientific mentors.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- A scoping review of mentorship in a CTSA context: A summary of past work and an agenda for future research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Virtual Team-Based Mentorship: Fostering Knowledge Acquisition, Career Advancement, and Connectedness.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2025Article
- Mentorship Interventions in Postgraduate Medical and STEM Settings: A Scoping Review.CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- Optimizing a mentorship program from the perspective of academic medicine leadership - a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- A system-wide health sciences faculty mentor training program is associated with improved effective mentoring and institutional climate.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Clinical and translational research workforce education survey identifies needs of faculty and staff.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Value of peer mentoring for early career professional, research, and personal development: a case study of implementation scientists.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Formative evaluation results of a phase 2 Center of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- An institution-wide faculty mentoring program at an academic health center with 6-year prospective outcome data - ADDENDUM.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is discontent and turnover among faculty at US academic health centers because of the challenges in balancing clinical, research, teaching, and work-life responsibilities in the current healthcare environment. One potential strategy to improve faculty satisfaction and limit turnover is through faculty mentoring programs.
methodsA Mentor Leadership Council was formed to design and implement an institution-wide faculty mentoring program across all colleges at an academic health center. The authors conducted an experimental study of the impact of the mentoring program using pre-intervention (2011) and 6-year (2017) post-intervention faculty surveys that measured the long-term effectiveness of the program.
resultsThe percent of faculty who responded to the surveys was 45.9% (656/1428) in 2011 and 40.2% (706/1756) in 2017. For faculty below the rank of full professor, percent of faculty with a mentor (45.3% vs. 67.1%,
conclusionsImplementation of an institution-wide faculty mentoring program significantly improved metrics of career development and faculty satisfaction but was not associated with a reduction in the percent of faculty considering leaving the institution. This suggests the need for additional efforts to identify and limit factors driving faculty turnover.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.