ArticleRoyal Society open science2019
What do we know about the fossil record of pinnipeds? A historiographical investigation.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep time dietary convergence evidenced by the stomach contents of a fossil seal from the Southwest Atlantic.Royal Society open science · 2026Article
- Dokdo sea lion Zalophus japonicus genome reveals its evolutionary trajectory before extinction.BMC biology · 2025Article
- The Miocene sealRoyal Society open science · 2025Article
- Aquatic sloths (PeerJ · 2025Article
- A new seal from the Late Miocene of the Eastern Paratethys highlights the past regional diversity of true seals (Phocidae).Swiss journal of palaeontology · 2025Article
- Article
- The extinct marine megafauna of the Phanerozoic.Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2024Review
- A quantitative test of the "Ecomorphotype Hypothesis" for fossil true seals (Family Phocidae).PeerJ · 2024Article
- Giant baleen whales emerged from a cold southern cradle.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Bridging two oceans: small toothed cetaceans (Odontoceti) from the Late Miocene Chagres Formation, eastern Caribbean (Colon, Panama).Biology letters · 2023Article
- First monk seal from the Southern Hemisphere rewrites the evolutionary history of true seals.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- A new large-bodied Pliocene seal with unusual cutting teeth.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fossil record of pinnipeds (seals, fur seals and walruses) is globally distributed, spanning from the late Oligocene to the Holocene. This record shows a complex evolutionary history that could not otherwise be inferred from their extant relatives, including multiple radiations and iterative ecomorphological specializations among different lineages, many of which are extinct. The fossil record of pinnipeds is not uniformly represented in space and time, however, leaving some gaps in our knowledge. We performed a historiographical investigation of the published fossil record of pinnipeds based on the information available in the Paleobiology Database, with the aim to broadly characterize and evaluate it from a taxonomic, geographical and temporal perspective. We identified major trends, strengths and weaknesses of the pinniped fossil record, including potential biases that may affect our interpretations. We found that 39% of the record corresponds to extant taxa, which are essentially from the Pleistocene and Holocene. There is a larger record from the Northern Hemisphere, suggesting biases in sampling and collection effort. The record is not strongly biased by sedimentary outcrop bias. Specifically, for extinct species, nearly half of them are represented by a single occurrence and a large proportion have type specimens consisting of single isolated postcranial elements. While the pinniped fossil record may have adequate temporal and taxonomic coverage, it has a strong geographical bias and its comparability is hindered by the incompleteness of type specimens. These results should be taken into account when addressing patterns of their past diversity, evolutionary history and paleoecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.