ArticleRoyal Society open science2019
Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cranial osteology and neuroanatomy of the late Permian reptileRoyal Society open science · 2025Article
- A small venomous reptile from the Late Triassic (Norian) of the southwestern United States.PeerJ · 2024Article
- A new Carboniferous edaphosaurid and the origin of herbivory in mammal forerunners.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
- Snake-like limb loss in a Carboniferous amniote.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- The Making of Calibration Sausage Exemplified by Recalibrating the Transcriptomic Timetree of Jawed Vertebrates.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Can We Reliably Calibrate Deep Nodes in the Tetrapod Tree? Case Studies in Deep Tetrapod Divergences.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection to '2020
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Redescription of the holotype specimen of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.