Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31827787›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2019

Proteome changes of porcine follicular fluid during follicle development.

Victor M Paes, Shengfa F Liao, Jose R Figueiredo, Scott T Willard, Peter L Ryan, Jean M Feugang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor M Paes1Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, 4025 Wise Center, PO Box 9815, Starkville, Mississippi State MS 39762 USA.
Shengfa F Liao1Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, 4025 Wise Center, PO Box 9815, Starkville, Mississippi State MS 39762 USA.
Jose R Figueiredo2Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocyte and Preantral follicles, State University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE Brazil.
Scott T Willard1Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, 4025 Wise Center, PO Box 9815, Starkville, Mississippi State MS 39762 USA.
Peter L Ryan1Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, 4025 Wise Center, PO Box 9815, Starkville, Mississippi State MS 39762 USA.
Jean M Feugang1Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, 4025 Wise Center, PO Box 9815, Starkville, Mississippi State MS 39762 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1376-5059
Mississippi State University · USUniversidade Estadual do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian follicular fluid influences follicle and oocyte growth, but the fluctuation of its protein content during folliculogenesis has not been comprehensively analyzed. Here we used a shotgun approach and bioinformatics analyses to investigate and compare the proteomes of porcine follicular fluid (pFF) obtained from small (< 4 mm), medium (4-6 mm) and large (> 6-12 mm) follicles.

resultsFollicular fluid samples containing highest estrogen levels were selected as non-atretic from small (SNA: 26.1 ± 15 ng/mL), medium (MNA: 162 ± 54 ng/mL), and large (LNA: 290 ± 37 ng/mL) follicles for proteomic analyses. We detected 1627, 1699, and 1756 proteins in SNA, MNA, and LNA samples, respectively. Nearly 60-63% of total proteins were specific to each sample, 11-13% were shared in pairwise comparisons, and 247 proteins were shared among all samples. Functional categorization indicated comparable gene ontology (GO) terms distribution per cellular component, molecular function, and biological process categories across samples; however, the ranking of highly significantly enriched GO terms per category revealed differences between samples. The patterns of protein-to-protein interactions varied throughout follicle development, and proteins such as serine protease inhibitor, clade E (SERPINE); plasminogen activator, urokinase (PLAU); and plasminogen activator, urokinase receptor (PLAUR) appeared stage-specific to SNA, MNA, and LNA, respectively. The "complement and coagulation cascades" was the common major pathway. Besides, properdin and fibulin-1 were abundant proteins that appeared absent in LNA samples.

conclusionThis study provides extensive and functional analyses of the pFF proteome changes during folliculogenesis and offers the potential for novel biomarker discovery in pFF for oocyte quality assessment.

Indexed as

Follicular fluidFolliculogenesisPigShotgun proteomic

Identifiers

PMID31827787
PMCPMC6902611
OpenAlexW2994810481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.