ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2019
Systems-Pharmacology-Based Identification of Antitumor Necrosis Factor Effect in Mimeng Flower Decoction for the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kaempferol's Therapeutic Applications and Mechanistic Insights in Ocular Diseases: Current Progress, Challenges, and Translational Opportunities.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Traditional Chinese medicine in diabetes management: a comprehensive review of mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Elucidating the mechanism by which Aloe-emodin from Cassiae semen treats diabetic retinopathy via network pharmacology and experimental verification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Therapeutic Effect and Mechanism of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Review
- Effectiveness and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.World journal of diabetes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The traditional Chinese medicine of Mimeng flower decoction (MFD) is effective in treating diabetic retinopathy (DR), but the mechanism is still unclear. This study aims at investigating the mechanism of MFD in treating DR. First, active compounds in MFD were filtered out by the systems pharmacology method and used as bait to fish potential targets. The common genes between the targets and DR-related genes were selected to construct the compound-target-disease network and identify the network hub gene as a key gene. Molecular docking was simulated to assess the binding affinity of active compounds towards the gene protein. Streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced diabetic rat model was administered to evaluate the efficacy of MFD in treating DR and its effects on retinal gene expression. Finally, 53 active compounds were screened out from the seven herbs in MFD, with a total of 136 targets. After intersecting with 210 DR-related genes, 21 common genes were applied to construct the network, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) was identified as the hub gene. The active compounds of acacetin, kaempferol, luteolin, and quercetin showed a good binding affinity towards TNF (C-score ≥ 4). In diabetic rats, MFD treatment reversed the retinal impairment and decreased retinal TNF expression significantly. In conclusion, this study adopted the method of systems pharmacology to screen out active compounds and construct the compound-target-disease network and found that MFD could ameliorate DR by downregulating the network hub gene of TNF.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.