Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31827506›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2019

The Use of Biopsy and "No-Biopsy" Approach for Diagnosing Paediatric Coeliac Disease in the Central European Region.

Petra Riznik, Márta Balogh, Piroska Bódi, Luigina De Leo, Jasmina Dolinsek, Ildikó Guthy, Judit Gyimesi, Ágnes Horváth, Ildikó Kis, Martina Klemenak and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diagnosing childhood celiac disease using ESPGHAN 2012 and 2020 guidelines: Tighter adherence is required!Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 14 institutions in 6 countries.

Petra RiznikUniversity Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Paediatrics, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Unit, Maribor, Slovenia.
Márta BaloghMarkusovszky Teaching Hospital, Szombathely, Hungary.
Piroska BódiPándy Kálmán Hospital, Gyula, Hungary.
Luigina De LeoIRCCS Burlo Garofolo Trieste, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy.
Jasmina DolinsekMunicipality of Maribor, Project Office, Maribor, Slovenia.
Ildikó GuthyJósa András County Hospital, Nyíregyháza, Hungary.
Judit GyimesiHeim Pál National Paediatric Institute, Coeliac Disease Centre, Budapest, Hungary.
Ágnes HorváthCsolnoky Ferenc County Hospital, Veszprém, Hungary.
Ildikó KisSt. Barbara County Hospital, Tatabánya, Hungary.
Martina KlemenakUniversity Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Paediatrics, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Unit, Maribor, Slovenia.
Berthold KoletzkoStiftung Kindergesundheit (Child Health Foundation) at Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sibylle KoletzkoDr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Clinical Medical Centre, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ilma Rita Korponay-SzabóHeim Pál National Paediatric Institute, Coeliac Disease Centre, Budapest, Hungary.
Tomaz KrencnikUniversity Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Paediatrics, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Unit, Maribor, Slovenia.
Tarcisio NotIRCCS Burlo Garofolo Trieste, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy.
Goran PalcevskiUniversity Hospital Rijeka, Department for Gastroenterology, Paediatric Clinic, Rijeka, Croatia.
Éva PollákAjka County Hospital, Ajka, Hungary.
Daniele SblatteroUniversity of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
István TokodiSt. George Fejér County University Teaching Hospital, Székesfehérvár, Hungary.
Matej VogrincicUniversity Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Informatics, Maribor, Slovenia.
Katharina Julia WerkstetterDr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Clinical Medical Centre, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jernej DolinsekUniversity Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Paediatrics, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Unit, Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8095-5592
University Clinical Centre Maribor · SIIRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Maribor · SIBékés Megyei Központi Kórház · HUHeim Pál Országos Gyermekgyógyászati Intézet · HUJósa András Múzeum · HUKodolányi János University of Applied Sciences · HUMarkusovszky Egyetemi Oktatókórház · HUSzent Borbála Kórház · HUUniversity of Debrecen · HUUniversity of Rijeka · HRUniversity of Trieste · ITUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe current European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidelines introduced the option to diagnose coeliac disease (CD) in children and adolescents without upper endoscopy if the defined criteria are met. The aim of our study was to evaluate how frequently paediatric gastroenterologists in Central Europe used the "no-biopsy" approach and how often the duodenal biopsy could have been omitted.

methodsMedical records of patients aged < 19 years diagnosed with CD in 2016 from five European countries were analysed, focusing on levels of transglutaminase antibodies (TGA) at the time of diagnosis and on whether the diagnosis was confirmed using duodenal biopsy or "no-biopsy" approach. Clinical presentation and delays until final diagnosis were analysed according to diagnostic approach.

resultsData from 653 children (63.9% female, median age: 7 years, range: 7 months-18.5 years) from Croatia, Hungary, Germany, Italy, and Slovenia were analysed. One fifth (

conclusionIn this cohort, about 60% of symptomatic CD patients could have been diagnosed without duodenal biopsies. The aim of the "no-biopsy" approach was to make the diagnostic procedure less challenging without compromising its reliability. However, this option was applied only in 20%, in spite of fewer burdens to the family and reduced costs. The reasons for this discrepancy are unknown. Physicians should be made more aware about the reliability of CD diagnosis without biopsies when the ESPGHAN guidelines for CD diagnosis are followed.

Identifiers

PMID31827506
PMCPMC6885281
OpenAlexW2987390044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.