Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31827416›Full record

ReviewDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society

Circulating DNA, a Potentially Sensitive and Specific Diagnostic Tool for Future Medicine.

Fan Jiang, Xiaoxiao Yang, Xiping He, Mingming Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fan JiangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaoxiao YangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, Zhejiang, China.
Xiping HeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, Zhejiang, China.
Mingming YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6312-7664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy has the great potential of detecting early diseases before deterioration and is valued for screening abnormalities at early stage. In oncology, circulating DNA derived from shed cancer cells reflects the tissue of origin, so it could be used to locate tissue sites during early screening. However, the heterogenous parameters of different types limit the clinical application, making it inaccessible to encompass all the cancer types. Instead, for reproducible scenario as pregnancy, fetal cell-free DNA has been well utilized for screening aneuploidies. Noninvasive and convenient as is, it would be of great value in the next decades far more than early diagnosis. This review recapitulates the discovery and development of tumor and fetal cell-free DNA. The common factors are also present that could be taken into consideration when collecting, transporting, and preserving samples. Meanwhile, several protocols used for purifying cell-free DNA, either classic ones or through commercial kits, are compared carefully. In addition, the development of technologies for analyzing cell-free DNA have been summarized and discussed in detail, especially some up-to-date approaches. At the end, the potential prospect of circulating DNA is bravely depicted. In summary, although there would be a lot of efforts before it's prevalent, cell-free DNA remains a promising tool in point-of-care diagnostic medicine.

Indexed as

circulating DNAdiagnosisliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID31827416
PMCPMC6886285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.