Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31827352›Full record

Trial reportJournal of sports science & medicine2019

Effect of the Anode Placement on the Antagonist Muscles Recruitment: Implication for the Interpolated Twitch Technique Outcome.

Enzo Piponnier, Ashref Thorkani, Firas Zghal, François Cottin, Vincent Martin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Enzo PiponnierUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire des Adaptations Métaboliques à l'Exercice en conditions Physiologiques et Pathologiques (AME2P), Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Ashref ThorkaniUniversité d'Evry-Val-d'Essonne/Genopole, Unité de Biologie Intégrative des Adaptations à l'Exercice, Evry, France.
Firas ZghalUniversité Nice Sofia Antipolis, Laboratoire Motricité Humaine Expertise Sport Santé (LAMHESS), Nice, France.
François CottinUniversité Paris-Sud, Laboratoire Complexité, Innovations, Activités Motrices et Sportives (CIAMS), Orsay, France.
Vincent MartinUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire des Adaptations Métaboliques à l'Exercice en conditions Physiologiques et Pathologiques (AME2P), Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the recruitment of the antagonist muscles and its effect on the measurement of the voluntary activation level (VA) of the knee extensor (KE) muscles for different anode placements used to stimulate the femoral nerve. We hypothesized that when the anode is positioned over the gluteal fold (GF), the antagonist muscles recruitment would be greater and, thus the VA overestimated, than when the anode is placed midway between the greater trochanter and the lower border of the iliac crest (Mid

Indexed as

AdultElectric StimulationElectromyographyFemoral NerveHumansIsometric ContractionKneeMaleMuscle, SkeletalYoung Adultelectrical nerve stimulationelectromyographyknee extensorsknee flexorsrecruitment curveVoluntary activation level

Identifiers

PMID31827352
PMCPMC6873139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.