Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31827342›Full record

ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2019

Daily Step-Based Recommendations Related to Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Adolescents.

Daniel Mayorga-Vega, Carolina Casado-Robles, Jesús Viciana, Iván López-Fernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Sedentary Behavior Patterns After ACL Reconstruction.International journal of exercise science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel Mayorga-VegaDepartment of Didactic of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, Faculty of Humanities and Education Sciences, University of Jaen.
Carolina Casado-RoblesDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada.
Jesús VicianaDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada.
Iván López-FernándezBiodynamic and Body Composition Laboratory, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Malaga.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among adolescents empirical studies examining the total daily steps translation of the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity recommendation are scarce and inconsistent, and there are no previous studies with cadence-based steps and related to sedentary behavior. The main objective of the present study was to establish and compare the accuracy of daily step-based recommendations related to the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behavior thresholds in adolescents. The present study followed a cross-sectional design. A total of 126 adolescents (56 girls) aged 12-15 years old were assessed by ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers for eight consecutive days (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sedentary behavior, and steps) and the multistage 20-meter shuttle run test (cardiorespiratory fitness). ROC curve analyses showed that total daily steps (AUC = 0.94, 0.89-0.99; Threshold ≥ 11,111 steps/ day;

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorAccelerometryAdolescentBody HeightBody Mass IndexCardiorespiratory FitnessChildCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionROC CurveWaist Circumferencechildrencut-off pointstep countsSteps/ daythresholdswalking cadence

Identifiers

PMID31827342
PMCPMC6873126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.