Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31827323›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2019

An Evaluation Of Single And Dual Long-Acting Bronchodilator Therapy As Effective Interventions In Maintenance Therapy-Naïve Patients With COPD.

Dave Singh, Anthony D D'Urzo, James F Donohue, Edward M Kerwin, Eduard Molins, Ferran Chuecos, Anna Ribera, Diana Jarreta

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Future concepts in bronchodilation for COPD: dual-European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting βTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Dave SinghMedicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Anthony D D'UrzoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
James F DonohueDivision of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina Pulmonary Critical Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4439-6866
Edward M KerwinClinical Research Institute, Medford, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1697-9036
Eduard MolinsBioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain.
Ferran ChuecosBioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna RiberaBioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain.
Diana JarretaBioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain.
AstraZeneca (Spain) · ESClinical Research Institute · USManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ideally, treatment recommendations for maintenance therapy-naïve patients with COPD should be based on studies conducted specifically in this population. We have reviewed evidence from previous studies of pharmacological treatments in maintenance therapy-naïve patients with COPD and performed a new post-hoc analysis of dual bronchodilator treatment in this population, aiming to assess the effectiveness of these interventions. Materials and methods: A literature review identified clinical trials that included analyses of patients with COPD who were maintenance therapy-naïve with long-acting β Results: Treatment-naïve patients with COPD often represent a population of patients at the earliest stage at which most patients seek treatment. Of nine relevant studies identified, all reported positive findings for efficacy of LABA, LAMA, or LABA/LAMA treatment in maintenance therapy-naïve populations. Improvements were observed in lung function, symptoms, and health status versus monotherapy or placebo. Post-hoc analysis of ACLIFORM and AUGMENT demonstrated that AB/FF was effective in improving lung function in patients who had received no prior maintenance therapy. AB/FF showed improvements in 1 hr post-dose FEV Conclusion: These data show that therapeutic intervention is effective in treatment-naïve patients. Intervention with dual bronchodilator therapy as a first maintenance treatment for COPD may provide greater benefits than LAMA or LABA monotherapy.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDisease ProgressionDrug CombinationsForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLungMuscarinic AntagonistsNebulizers and VaporizersObservational Studies as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionTime FactorsAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsDrug CombinationsMuscarinic AntagonistsCOPDLABALAMAtreatment-naïve

Identifiers

PMID31827323
PMCPMC6902852
OpenAlexW2991799242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.