ArticleScientific reports2019
3D-printed biological cell phantom for testing 3D quantitative phase imaging systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inverse scattering in biological samples via beam propagation.Science advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Characterization of a Single-Capture Bright-Field and Off-Axis Digital Holographic Microscope for Biological Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantitative phase imaging verification in large field-of-view lensless holographic microscopy via two-photon 3D printing.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Recent Advances and Current Trends in Transmission Tomographic Diffraction Microscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Influence of Yokukansan on the refractive index of neuroblastoma cells.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- 3D scattering microphantom sample to assess quantitative accuracy in tomographic phase microscopy techniques.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Near-infrared, wavelength, and illumination scanning holographic tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Optical coherence tomography-in situ and high-speed 3D imaging for laser materials processing.Light, science & applications · 2022Article
- Interlaboratory evaluation of a digital holographic microscopy-based assay for label-free in vitro cytotoxicity testing of polymeric nanocarriers.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Article
- Review
- Challenges and advances in optical 3D mesoscale imaging.Journal of microscopy · 2022Article
- Roadmap on Digital Holography-Based Quantitative Phase Imaging.Journal of imaging · 2021Review
- Common-path intrinsically achromatic optical diffraction tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Porous Phantoms Mimicking Tissues-Investigation of Optical Parameters Stability Over Time.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Optical diffraction tomography with finite object support for the minimization of missing cone artifacts.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the 3D quantitative phase imaging (QPI) methods mature, their further development calls for reliable tools and methods to characterize and compare their metrological parameters. We use refractive index engineering during two-photon laser photolithography to fabricate a life-scale phantom of a biological cell with internal structures that mimic optical and structural properties of mammalian cells. After verification with a number of reference techniques, the phantom is used to characterize the performance of a limited-angle holographic tomography microscope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.