ArticleScientific reports2019
Population relationships based on 170 ancestry SNPs from the combined Kidd and Seldin panels.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advancement in Human Face Prediction Using DNA.Genes · 2023Pooled it
- Immunogenomic diversity of triple-negative breast cancers in obese and non-obese black and white women.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Assessment of a microhaplotype panel for human identification and ancestry inference in Brazil.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Genetic ancestry shapes dengue virus infection in human skin explants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Genetic Ancestry and Lung Cancer in Latin American Patients: A Crucial Step for Understanding a Diverse Population.Clinical lung cancer · 2025Review
- scAI-SNP: a method for inferring ancestry from single-cell data.BMC methods · 2025Article
- CYP2C gene polymorphisms in North African populations.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Dense single nucleotide polymorphism testing revolutionizes scope and degree of certainty for source attribution in forensic investigations.Croatian medical journal · 2024Review
- Revisiting informed consent in forensic genomics in light of current technologies and the times.International journal of legal medicine · 2023Article
- Challenges in selecting admixture models and marker sets to infer genetic ancestry in a Brazilian admixed population.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Overview of frequent pattern mining.Genomics & informatics · 2022Article
- North Asian population relationships in a global context.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Determining the Area of Ancestral Origin for Individuals From North Eurasia Based on 5,229 SNP Markers.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Comprehensive Insights Into Forensic Features and Genetic Background of Chinese Northwest Hui Group Using Six Distinct Categories of 231 Molecular Markers.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The benefits of ancestry informative SNP (AISNP) panels can best accrue and be properly evaluated only as sufficient reference population data become readily accessible. Ideally the set of reference populations should approximate the genetic diversity of human populations worldwide. The Kidd and Seldin AISNP sets are two panels that have separately accumulated thus far the largest and most diverse collections of data on human reference populations from the major continental regions. A recent tally in the ALFRED allele frequency database finds 164 reference populations available for all the 55 Kidd AISNPs and 132 reference populations for all the 128 Seldin AISNPs. Although much more of the genetic diversity in human populations around the world still needs to be documented, 81 populations have genotype data available for all 170 AISNPs in the union of the Kidd and Seldin panels. In this report we examine admixture and principal component analyses on these 81 worldwide populations and some regional subsets of these reference populations to determine how well the combined panel illuminates population relationships. Analyses of this dataset that focused on Native American populations revealed very strong cluster patterns associated with many of the individual populations studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.