Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31827102›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Extracellular matrix hydrogel derived from decellularized tissues enables endodermal organoid culture.

Giovanni Giuseppe Giobbe, Claire Crowley, Camilla Luni, Sara Campinoti, Moustafa Khedr, Kai Kretzschmar, Martina Maria De Santis, Elisa Zambaiti, Federica Michielin, Laween Meran and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 268 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
268citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
44.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

268 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 464 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Application of 3D Cell Culture in Thyroid Cancer.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Supercritical COMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

208 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Giovanni Giuseppe Giobbe *Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6958-7303
Claire Crowley *Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Camilla Luni *Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies (SIAIS), ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1211-9629
Sara CampinotiStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Moustafa KhedrStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Kai KretzschmarOncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Martina Maria De SantisStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0733-2599
Elisa ZambaitiStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9610-1708
Federica MichielinStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Laween MeranStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Qianjiang HuShanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies (SIAIS), ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Gijs van SonOncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Luca UrbaniStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4988-552X
Anna ManfrediTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), Pozzuoli, Italy.
Monica GiomoVeneto Institute of Molecular Medicine & Dept. of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Simon EatonStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0892-9204
Davide CacchiarelliTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), Pozzuoli, Italy.
Vivian S W LiStem Cell and Cancer Biology Lab, the Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2041-0085
Hans CleversOncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-5582
Paola BonfantiStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Nicola Elvassore *Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK. n.elvassore@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7029-6287
Paolo De Coppi *Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Section, University College London GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK. p.decoppi@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1659-0207
University College London · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GBRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences · NLShanghaiTech University · CNTelethon Institute Of Genetics And Medicine · ITGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity of Padua · ITVeneto Institute of Molecular Medicine · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust FC001105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organoids have extensive therapeutic potential and are increasingly opening up new avenues within regenerative medicine. However, their clinical application is greatly limited by the lack of effective GMP-compliant systems for organoid expansion in culture. Here, we envisage that the use of extracellular matrix (ECM) hydrogels derived from decellularized tissues (DT) can provide an environment capable of directing cell growth. These gels possess the biochemical signature of tissue-specific ECM and have the potential for clinical translation. Gels from decellularized porcine small intestine (SI) mucosa/submucosa enable formation and growth of endoderm-derived human organoids, such as gastric, hepatic, pancreatic, and SI. ECM gels can be used as a tool for direct human organoid derivation, for cell growth with a stable transcriptomic signature, and for in vivo organoid delivery. The development of these ECM-derived hydrogels opens up the potential for human organoids to be used clinically.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell ProliferationEndodermExtracellular MatrixHumansHydrogelsOrganoidsSwineTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID31827102
PMCPMC6906306
OpenAlexW2996112306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.