Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31827070›Full record

ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2019

The activation of bystander CD8

Tae-Shin Kim, Eui-Cheol Shin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Lung Resident T Cells Across the Spectrum of TB Infection and Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CD8Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tae-Shin KimLaboratory of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.
Eui-Cheol ShinLaboratory of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea. ecshin@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-9503
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2017R1A2A1A17069782National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2018M3A9D3079498National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2018R1A6A3A01010977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During viral infections, significant numbers of T cells are activated in a T cell receptor-independent and cytokine-dependent manner, a phenomenon referred to as "bystander activation." Cytokines, including type I interferons, interleukin-18, and interleukin-15, are the most important factors that induce bystander activation of T cells, each of which plays a somewhat different role. Bystander T cells lack specificity for the pathogen, but can nevertheless impact the course of the immune response to the infection. For example, bystander-activated CD8

Indexed as

AnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHepatitisHumansInterferon-gammaInterleukin-15Virus DiseasesInterferon-gammaInterleukin-15

Identifiers

PMID31827070
PMCPMC6906361
OpenAlexW2996128776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.