Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31826945›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Integration of Motion and Form Cues for the Perception of Self-Motion in the Human Brain.

Shu-Guang Kuai, Zhou-Kui-Dong Shan, Jing Chen, Zhe-Xin Xu, Jia-Mei Li, David T Field, Li Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shu-Guang KuaiFaculty of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China, LL114@nyu.edu sgkuai@psy.ecnu.edu.cn.
Zhou-Kui-Dong ShanNew York University-East China Normal University Joint Research Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai 200062, China.
Jing ChenNew York University-East China Normal University Joint Research Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai 200062, China.
Zhe-Xin XuFaculty of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3165-5416
Jia-Mei LiFaculty of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.
David T FieldCenter for Integrative Neuroscience & Neurodynamics, Department of Psychology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AL, United Kingdom.
Li LiNew York University-East China Normal University Joint Research Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai 200062, China, LL114@nyu.edu sgkuai@psy.ecnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8579-4975
New York University Shanghai · CNEast China Normal University · CNUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When moving around in the world, the human visual system uses both motion and form information to estimate the direction of self-motion (i.e., heading). However, little is known about cortical areas in charge of this task. This brain-imaging study addressed this question by using visual stimuli consisting of randomly distributed dot pairs oriented toward a locus on a screen (the form-defined focus of expansion [FoE]) but moved away from a different locus (the motion-defined FoE) to simulate observer translation. We first fixed the motion-defined FoE location and shifted the form-defined FoE location. We then made the locations of the motion- and the form-defined FoEs either congruent (at the same location in the display) or incongruent (on the opposite sides of the display). The motion- or the form-defined FoE shift was the same in the two types of stimuli, but the perceived heading direction shifted for the congruent, but not for the incongruent stimuli. Participants (both sexes) made a task-irrelevant (contrast discrimination) judgment during scanning. Searchlight and ROI-based multivoxel pattern analysis revealed that early visual areas V1, V2, and V3 responded to either the motion- or the form-defined FoE shift. After V3, only the dorsal areas V3a and V3B/KO responded to such shifts. Furthermore, area V3B/KO shows a significantly higher decoding accuracy for the congruent than the incongruent stimuli. Our results provide direct evidence showing that area V3B/KO does not simply respond to motion and form cues but integrates these two cues for the perception of heading.

Indexed as

BrainCuesFemaleForm PerceptionHumansMaleMotion PerceptionOptic FlowPhotic StimulationVisual Cortexcue integrationformheadingmotionoptic flowV3B/KO

Identifiers

PMID31826945
PMCPMC6988997
OpenAlexW2994987970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.