Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31826944›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Auditory Selectivity for Spectral Contrast in Cortical Neurons and Behavior.

Nina L T So, Jacob A Edwards, Sarah M N Woolley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Developmental encoding of natural sounds in the mouse auditory cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  4. Dissociable Roles of the Auditory Midbrain and Cortex in Processing the Statistical Features of Natural Sound Textures.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Parasite effects on receivers in animal communication: Hidden impacts on behavior, ecology, and evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. What do mammals have to say about the neurobiology of acoustic communication?Molecular psychology : brain, behavior, and society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nina L T SoProgram in Neurobiology and Behavior.
Jacob A EdwardsPsychology Department, and.
Sarah M N WoolleyProgram in Neurobiology and Behavior, sw2277@columbia.edu.
MIND Research Institute · US

Funding

Neural Coding and Perception of Learned VocalizationsR01DC009810 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI WOOLLEY, SARAH M · 2010 to 2020
$3.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocal communication relies on the ability of listeners to identify, process, and respond to vocal sounds produced by others in complex environments. To accurately recognize these signals, animals' auditory systems must robustly represent acoustic features that distinguish vocal sounds from other environmental sounds. Vocalizations typically have spectral structure; power regularly fluctuates along the frequency axis, creating spectral contrast. Spectral contrast is closely related to harmonicity, which refers to spectral power peaks occurring at integer multiples of a fundamental frequency. Although both spectral contrast and harmonicity typify natural sounds, they may differ in salience for communication behavior and engage distinct neural mechanisms. Therefore, it is important to understand which of these properties of vocal sounds underlie the neural processing and perception of vocalizations.Here, we test the importance of vocalization-typical spectral features in behavioral recognition and neural processing of vocal sounds, using male zebra finches. We show that behavioral responses to natural and synthesized vocalizations rely on the presence of discrete frequency components, but not on harmonic ratios between frequencies. We identify a specific population of neurons in primary auditory cortex that are sensitive to the spectral resolution of vocal sounds. We find that behavioral and neural response selectivity is explained by sensitivity to spectral contrast rather than harmonicity. This selectivity emerges within the cortex; it is absent in the thalamorecipient region and present in the deep output region. Further, deep-region neurons that are contrast-sensitive show distinct temporal responses and selectivity for modulation density compared with unselective neurons.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionFinchesMaleNeuronsRecognition, PsychologySound SpectrographyVocalization, Animalauditory cortexharmonic soundsperceptionsocial communicationsongbirdsvocalizations

Identifiers

PMID31826944
PMCPMC6989003
OpenAlexW2995654174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.