Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31826860›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2019

Antibiotic prescribing without documented indication in ambulatory care clinics: national cross sectional study.

Michael J Ray, Gregory B Tallman, David T Bearden, Miriam R Elman, Jessina C McGregor

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing in US Emergency Department Visits, 2016-2021.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael J RayOregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR 97239, USA raymi@ohsu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7670-9639
Gregory B TallmanPacific University School of Pharmacy, Hillsboro, OR 97123, USA.
David T BeardenOregon State University College of Pharmacy, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Miriam R ElmanOregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Jessina C McGregorOregon State University College of Pharmacy, Portland, OR 97201, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify the frequency with which antibiotics are prescribed in the absence of a documented indication in the ambulatory care setting, to quantify the potential effect on assessments of appropriateness of antibiotics, and to understand patient, provider, and visit level characteristics associated with antibiotic prescribing without a documented indication.

designCross sectional study.

setting2015 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

participants28 332 sample visits representing 990.9 million ambulatory care visits nationwide.

main outcome measuresOverall antibiotic prescribing and whether each antibiotic prescription was accompanied by appropriate, inappropriate, or no documented indication as identified through ICD-9-CM (international classification of diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification) codes. Survey weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate potential risk factors for receipt of an antibiotic prescription without a documented indication.

resultsAntibiotics were prescribed during 13.2% (95% confidence interval 11.6% to 13.7%) of the estimated 990.8 million ambulatory care visits in 2015. According to the criteria, 57% (52% to 62%) of the 130.5 million prescriptions were for appropriate indications, 25% (21% to 29%) were inappropriate, and 18% (15% to 22%) had no documented indication. This corresponds to an estimated 24 million prescriptions without a documented indication. Being an adult male, spending more time with the provider, and seeing a non-primary care specialist were significantly positively associated with antibiotic prescribing without an indication. Sulfonamides and urinary anti-infective agents were the antibiotic classes most likely to be prescribed without documentation.

conclusionsThis nationally representative study of ambulatory visits identified a large number of prescriptions for antibiotics without a documented indication. Antibiotic prescribing in the absence of a documented indication may severely bias national estimates of appropriate antibiotic use in this setting. This study identified a wide range of factors associated with antibiotic prescribing without a documented indication, which may be useful in directing initiatives aimed at supporting better documentation.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesPractice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug UtilizationHumansInappropriate PrescribingRisk FactorsUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID31826860
PMCPMC7190070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.