Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31826794›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2019

Understanding barriers to women seeking and receiving help for perinatal mental health problems in UK general practice: development of a questionnaire.

Elizabeth Ford, Hannah Roomi, Hannah Hugh, Harm van Marwijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Perinatal mental health care in the Italian mental health departments: a national survey.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth FordDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5613-8509
Hannah RoomiDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Hannah HughDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Harm van MarwijkDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop a questionnaire to measure quantitatively barriers and facilitators to women's disclosure of perinatal mental health problems in UK primary care. To pilot and evaluate the questionnaire for content validity and internal consistency.

backgroundAround 15% of women develop a mental illness in the perinatal period, such as depression, anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder. In the United Kingdom, 90% of these women will be cared for in primary care, yet currently in as many as 50% of cases, no discussion of this issue takes place. One reason for this is that women experience barriers to disclosing symptoms of perinatal mental illness in primary care. These have previously been explored qualitatively, but no tool currently exists with which to measure these barriers quantitatively.

methodsQuestionnaire items, drawn from qualitative literature and accounts of women's experiences, were identified, refined iteratively and arranged in themes. The questionnaire was piloted using cognitive debriefing interviews to establish content validity. Women completed a refined version online. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. Internal consistency of subscales was calculated using Cronbach's alpha.

findingsCognitive debriefing interviews with five women showed the majority of questionnaire items were relevant, appropriate and easy to understand. The final questionnaire was completed by 71 women, and the majority of subscales had good internal consistency. The barrier scoring most highly was fear and stigma, followed by willingness to seek help and logistics of attending an appointment. Family/partner support and general practitioners' (GPs) reaction were the lowest scoring barriers. Factors facilitating disclosure were GPs being empathetic and non-judgemental and listening during discussions. In the future, this questionnaire can be used to examine which barriers are most important for particular groups of women. This may enable the development of strategies to improve acknowledgement and discussion, and prevent under-recognition and under-treatment, of perinatal mental health problems in primary care.

Indexed as

Help-Seeking BehaviorAdultFemaleHumansMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePerinatal CarePregnant PeopleQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdombarriersgeneral practicehelp-seekingperinatal mental healthpostnatal depressionquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID31826794
PMCPMC7003527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.