Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31826785›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2019

Prevalence and risk factors associated with

A F A Pires, L Patterson, E A Kukielka, P Aminabadi, N Navarro-Gonzalez, M T Jay-Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prevalence and Characteristics ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fluoroquinolone-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Risk factors of Shiga toxin-producingEpidemiology and infection · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Infection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  13. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Molecular Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Identification and Characterization ofFrontiers in public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A F A PiresDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9326-0298
L PattersonDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA95616, USA.
E A KukielkaDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA95616, USA.
P AminabadiWestern Center for Food Safety, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA95616, USA.
N Navarro-GonzalezWestern Center for Food Safety, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA95616, USA.
M T Jay-RussellWestern Center for Food Safety, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA95616, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diversified farms are operations that raise a variety of crops and/or multiple species of livestock, with the goal of utilising the products of one for the growth of the other, thus fostering a sustainable cycle. This type of farming reflects consumers' increasing demand for sustainably produced, naturally raised or pasture-raised animal products that are commonly produced on diversified farms. The specific objectives of this study were to characterise diversified small-scale farms (DSSF) in California, estimate the prevalence of Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter spp. in livestock and poultry, and evaluate the association between farm- and sample-level risk factors and the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. on DSSF in California using a multilevel logistic model. Most participating farms were organic and raised more than one animal species. Overall Salmonella prevalence was 1.19% (95% confidence interval (CI95) 0.6-2), and overall Campylobacter spp. prevalence was 10.8% (CI95 = 9-12.9). Significant risk factors associated with Campylobacter spp. were farm size (odds ratio (OR)10-50 acres: less than 10 acres = 6, CI95 = 2.11-29.8), ownership of swine (OR = 9.3, CI95 = 3.4-38.8) and season (ORSpring: Coastal summer = 3.5, CI95 = 1.1-10.9; ORWinter: Coastal summer = 3.23, CI95 = 1.4-7.4). As the number of DSSF continues to grow, evaluating risk factors and management practices that are unique to these operations will help identify risk mitigation strategies and develop outreach materials to improve the food safety of animal and vegetable products produced on DSSF.

Indexed as

LivestockAnimalsCaliforniaCampylobacter InfectionsCross-Sectional StudiesLogistic ModelsPoultry DiseasesPrevalenceRisk FactorsSalmonella entericaSalmonella Infections, AnimalAgroecologycampylobacterdiversified farmsfoodborne pathogensfood safetysalmonellasmall-scale farms

Identifiers

PMID31826785
PMCPMC7006025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.