Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31826244›Full record

ArticleBlood2020

Is there an optimal conditioning for older patients with AML receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation?

Stefan O Ciurea, Piyanuch Kongtim, Ankur Varma, Gabriela Rondon, Julianne Chen, Samer Srour, Qaiser Bashir, Amin Alousi, Rohtesh Mehta, Betul Oran and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Augmented Reduced-Intensity Regimen Does Not Improve Postallogeneic Transplant Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Allogeneic Transplantation for Older Adults.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan O CiureaDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Piyanuch KongtimDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Ankur VarmaDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Gabriela RondonDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Julianne ChenDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Samer SrourDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Qaiser BashirDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Amin AlousiDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Rohtesh MehtaDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Betul OranDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Uday PopatDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Chitra HosingDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Amanda OlsonDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Naval DaverDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Marina KonoplevaDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
Richard E ChamplinDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal conditioning regimen for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unclear. In this study, we compared outcomes of AML patients >60 years of age undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at our institution. All 404 consecutively treated patients received 1 of the following conditioning regimens: (1) fludarabine+melphalan 100 mg/m2 (FM100), (2) fludarabine+melphalan 140 mg/m2 (FM140), (3) fludarabine+IV busulfan AUC ≥ 5000/d × 4 d (Bu≥20000), and (4) fludarabine+IV busulfan AUC 4000/d × 4 d (Bu16000). A propensity score analysis (PSA) was used to compare outcomes between these 4 groups. Among the 4 conditioning regimens, the FM100 group had a significantly better long-term survival with 5-year progression-free survival of 49% vs 30%, 34%, and 23%, respectively. The benefit of the FM100 regimen resulted primarily from the lower nonrelapse mortality associated with this regimen, an effect more pronounced in patients with lower performance status. The PSA confirmed that FM100 was associated with better posttransplantation survival, whereas no significant differences were seen between the other regimen groups. In summary, older patients with AML benefited from a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen with lower melphalan doses (FM100), which was associated with better survival, even though it was primarily used in patients who could not receive a more intense conditioning regimen.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsBusulfanFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMelphalanMiddle AgedTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HomologousTreatment OutcomeVidarabineAntineoplastic AgentsBusulfanfludarabineMelphalanVidarabine

Identifiers

PMID31826244
PMCPMC8212356
OpenAlexW2996264176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.