ArticleRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)
A cerebrospinal fluid biosignature for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Importance of Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Circadian Disruption-Associated Biomarkers in Emergence of Alzheimer's Disease.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Towards accuracy and accessibility.Journal of biological methods · 2024Review
- Gut Microbial Metabolome and Dysbiosis in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Psychobiotics and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation as a Therapeutic Approach-A Comprehensive Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Lignan-Rich Sesame (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The potential of the gut microbiome for identifying Alzheimer's disease diagnostic biomarkers and future therapies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Biomarkers in Alzheimer disease: are we there yet?Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.