Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31826010›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Prognostic value of maximum standard uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Weibo Wen, Dongchun Xuan, Yulai Hu, Xiangdan Li, Lan Liu, Dongyuan Xu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Baseline fdg pet/ct-derived tumor burden and host metabolic activity predict complete metabolic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ınvasive ductal breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  6. [BMJ open · 2026
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Baseline and earlyCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison ofTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Association between tumorScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Weibo WenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated hospital of Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.
Dongchun XuanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated hospital of Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.
Yulai HuCenter of Morphological Experiment, Medical College of Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.
Xiangdan LiCenter of Morphological Experiment, Medical College of Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.
Lan LiuDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated hospital of Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.
Dongyuan XuCenter of Morphological Experiment, Medical College of Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA comprehensive systematic review of the literature was conducted on parameters from 18 F-FDG PET and a meta-analysis of the prognostic value of the maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesional glycolysis (TLG) in patients with breast cancer (BC). PATIENTS AND

methodsRelevant English articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were retrieved. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were used to assess the prognostic value of SUVmax, MTV, and TLG.

resultsA total of 20 primary studies with 3115 patients with BC were included. The combined HRs (95% confidence interval [CI] of higher SUVmax and higher TLG for event-free survival (EFS) were 1.53 (95% CI, 1.25-1.89, P = 0.0006) and 5.94 (95% CI, 2.57-13.71, P = 0.97), respectively. Regarding the overall survival (OS), the combined HRs were 1.22 (95%CI, 1.02-1.45, P = 0.0006) with higher SUVmax, and 2.91(95% CI, 1.75-4.85, P = 0.44) with higher MTV. Higher MTV showed no correlation with EFS [1.31(95% CI, 0.65-2.65, P = 0.18)] and similarly higher TLG showed no correlation with OS [1.20(95% CI, 0.65-2.23, P = 0.45)]. Subgroup analysis showed that SUVmax, with a median value of 5.55 was considered as a significant risk factor for both EFS and OS in BC patients.

conclusionDespite clinically heterogeneous BC patients and adoption of various methods between studies, the present meta-analysis results confirmed that patients with high SUVmax are at high risk of adverse events or death in BC patients, high MTV predicted a high risk of death and high TLG predicted a high risk of adverse events.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18GlycolysisHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisTumor BurdenFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID31826010
PMCPMC6905566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.