ArticlePloS one2019
Understanding the variability of handheld spectral-domain optical coherence tomography measurements in supine infants.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analyzing Retinal Microanatomy in Retinopathy of Prematurity to Improve Care (BabySTEPS)
Analyzing Retinal Microanatomy in Retinopathy of Prematurity to Improve Care 2 and School Age Follow on Study (BabySTEPS2)
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Very Preterm Infant Retinal Microanatomy at 36 Weeks' Postmenstrual Age and 2-Year Neurodevelopment.JAMA ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Retinal and Choroidal OCT Measures and Features at Term Equivalent Age in Preterm and Term Infants.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Cognitive and emotional engagement in negotiation: insights from EEG and fNIRS Hyperscanning.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- The Perspective of Using Optical Coherence Tomography in Ophthalmology: Present and Future Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- New Directions for Ophthalmic OCT - Handhelds, Surgery, and Robotics.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Review
- Early Single-Examination Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers for Treatment-Requiring Retinopathy of Prematurity.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Measurement of Foveal Retinal Thickness in Myopic Patients Using Different Display Modes on Optical Coherence Tomography: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Article
- Insights into the developing fovea revealed by imaging.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022Review
- Advances in Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Technology and Techniques for Choroidal and Retinal Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Repeatability and Reproducibility of Axial and Lateral Measurements on Handheld Optical Coherence Tomography Systems Compared with Tabletop System.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCentral foveal thickness (CFT) measurements from optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans provide a precise measure of severity of pathologic changes in the fovea, progress of disease and response to treatment. Although these measures are additionally valuable to assess foveal development in infants, their reproducibility is not known. The goal of this retrospective study is to evaluate the variation and reproducibility of CFT measurements using handheld spectral-domain OCT (hh-SDOCT) in supine infants compared to conventional adult tabletop imaging.
methodsImaging sessions with multiple macular, volume scans in one eye were selected for analysis from two participant groups: Group 1, 25 imaging sessions from 21 preterm infants without macular edema imaged supine in the nursery using hh-SDOCT (Leica/Bioptigen Envisu C2300, RTP, NC); Group 2, 25 imaging sessions from 25 adults imaged using tabletop Bioptigen SDOCT. For each imaging session, three macular OCT volumes with acceptable image quality were selected for analysis. CFTs were measured using a customized script for automatic segmentation. An expert grader and a typical grader corrected the segmentation lines for the central foveal frame. Coefficient of variations (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for graders and systems and compared to the previous literature on OCT reproducibility.
resultsCFT measurements were repeatable and reproducible for both handheld and tabletop SDOCT systems. For handheld, grader ICC (CI) and mean CV were 0.94 (0.90-0.97) and 3.8 (typical) and 0.98 (0.96-0.99) and 2.9 (expert), and for tabletop were 0.91(0.83-0.96) and 2.1 (typical) and 0.92 (0.86-0.96) and 1.9 (expert). Intergrader reproducibility of handheld and tabletop SDOCT systems were ICC(CI) 0.97 (0.95-0.98) and 0.93 (0.89-0.96) respectively, and both are comparable to previously reported reproducibility of tabletop systems.
conclusionHandheld SDOCT is a reproducible instrument to measure foveal thicknesses in supine infants. It can be used in clinical research to evaluate foveal changes during retinal development and pathological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.