Trial reportJAMA cardiology2020
Initiation of Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition After Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Secondary Analysis of the Open-label Extension of the PIONEER-HF Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02554890 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Active-controlled 8-week Study to Evaluate the Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Active-controlled 8-week Study to Evaluate the Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) Versus Enalapril on Changes in NT-proBNP and Safety and Tolerability of In-hospital Initiation of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril in HFrEF Patients Who Have Been Stabilized Following Hospitalization for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF).
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Future cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan combined with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after reperfusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- In-Hospital or Out-of-Hospital Initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Patients With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction After A Worsening Heart Failure Event: The PARAGLIDE-HF Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- The Relationship between Angiotensin-Neprilysin Treatment, Echocardiographic Parameters, and NT-proBNP Levels in HFpEF Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: Results from PARADIGM-HF India sub-study.Indian heart journalTrial
- Low T3 syndrome and short-term outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: A retrospective observational study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Early in-hospital treatment of acute heart failure. Part 2 of the international expert opinion series on AHF management.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- European Journal of Heart Failure consensus statement. Heart failure pharmacotherapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and concomitant atrial fibrillation: Review of evidence and call to action.European journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- Review
- Safety and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan in chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: Results from the open-label extension of the PARADIGM-HF study.European journal of heart failure · 2025Article
- Increased neprilysin expression is linked to atrial fibrotic remodeling in cardiovascular surgery patients.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Machine learning enhanced acute heart failure phenotype prediction using natural language processing and random forest.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Article
- Acute Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan with Initial Initiation in Pediatric Patients in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.Pediatric cardiology · 2024Article
- Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Advancements in Heart Failure Treatment.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- A Case-based Implementation of Heart Failure Therapies, a Consensus Pathway by the Saudi Heart Failure Working Group.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2024Article
- Cardiac reverse remodelling by imaging parameters with recent changes to guideline medical therapy in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2023Review
- Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Treatment.Korean circulation journal · 2023Review
- Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Treatment.International journal of heart failure · 2023Review
- The history and mystery of sacubitril/valsartan: From clinical trial to the real world.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In PIONEER-HF, among stabilized patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), the in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan was well tolerated and led to improved outcomes compared with enalapril. However, there are limited data comparing the strategies of in-hospital vs postdischarge initiation of sacubitril/valsartan. Objective: To describe changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in patients recently hospitalized for ADHF and switching from taking enalapril to taking sacubitril/valsartan after discharge and compare clinical outcomes for patients randomized to receive in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan vs in-hospital initiation of enalapril who later switched to taking sacubitril/valsartan during an open-label extension phase. Interventions: Sacubitril/valsartan titrated to 97/103 mg twice daily. Design, Setting, and Participants: The PIONEER-HF trial was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial conducted at 129 US sites between May 2016 and May 2018 that compared the in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan vs enalapril (titrated to target dose, 10 mg twice daily) for 8 weeks among patients admitted for ADHF with reduced ejection fraction and hemodynamic stability. All patients were to continue in a 4-week, open-label study of sacubitril/valsartan; of 881 patients enrolled in PIONEER-HF, 832 (94%) continued in the open-label study. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in NT-proBNP levels from week 8 to 12 as well as the exploratory composite of heart failure rehospitalization or cardiovascular death from randomization through week 12. Results: Of 881 participants, 226 (27.7%) were women, 487 (58.5%) were white, 297 (35.7%) were black, 15 (1.8%) were Asian, and 73 (8.8%) were of Hispanic ethnicity; the mean (SD) age was 61 (14) years. For patients who continued to take sacubitril/valsartan, NT-proBNP levels declined -17.2% (95% CI, -3.2 to -29.1) from week 8 to 12. The NT-proBNP levels declined to a greater extent for those switching from taking enalapril to sacubitril/valsartan after the week 8 visit (-37.4%; 95% CI, -28.1 to -45.6; P < .001; comparing changes in 2 groups). Over the entire 12 weeks of follow-up, patients that began taking sacubitril/valsartan in the hospital had a lower hazard for the composite outcome compared with patients that initiated enalapril in the hospital and then had a delayed initiation of sacubitril/valsartan 8 weeks later (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI 0.49-0.97). Conclusions and Relevance: Switching patients' treatment from enalapril to sacubitril/valsartan at 8 weeks after randomization led to a further 37% reduction in NT-proBNP levels in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and a recent hospitalization for ADHF. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02554890.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.