Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31825309›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Rod nuclear architecture determines contrast transmission of the retina and behavioral sensitivity in mice.

Kaushikaram Subramanian, Martin Weigert, Oliver Borsch, Heike Petzold, Alfonso Garcia-Ulloa, Eugene W Myers, Marius Ader, Irina Solovei, Moritz Kreysing

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kaushikaram SubramanianMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9050-5672
Martin WeigertMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Oliver BorschCenter for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Heike PetzoldMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Alfonso Garcia-UlloaMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Eugene W MyersMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Marius AderCenter for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9467-7677
Irina SoloveiBiozentrum, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München, Germany.
Moritz KreysingMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7432-3871
Center for Systems Biology Dresden · DEMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 031L0044Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft AD375/6-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC68Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FZT111Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB1064Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SO1054/3European Research Council 853619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rod photoreceptors of nocturnal mammals display a striking inversion of nuclear architecture, which has been proposed as an evolutionary adaptation to dark environments. However, the nature of visual benefits and the underlying mechanisms remains unclear. It is widely assumed that improvements in nocturnal vision would depend on maximization of photon capture at the expense of image detail. Here, we show that retinal optical quality improves 2-fold during terminal development, and that this enhancement is caused by nuclear inversion. We further demonstrate that improved retinal contrast transmission, rather than photon-budget or resolution, enhances scotopic contrast sensitivity by 18-27%, and improves motion detection capabilities up to 10-fold in dim environments. Our findings therefore add functional significance to a prominent exception of nuclear organization and establish retinal contrast transmission as a decisive determinant of mammalian visual perception.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusComputer SimulationContrast SensitivityFemaleGenes, ReporterLightMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMotion PerceptionRetinal Bipolar CellsRetinal Ganglion CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsRhodopsinRhodopsinbiophysicscell biologyChromatin organisationmouseopticsphysics of living systemsretinavisionvisual ecology

Identifiers

PMID31825309
PMCPMC6974353
OpenAlexW2995400432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.