ArticleVeterinary dermatology2020
In vitro killing of canine strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefazolin, cefovecin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin over a range of bacterial densities.
Article in Veterinary dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review of Fluoroquinolones with a Focus on Veterinary-Approved Agents.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Histopathological changes and inflammatory and cell death pathways in the lungs of Balb/c mice with pneumonia induced by different concentrations ofAnatomy & cell biology · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Strategies Proposed for the Treatment ofVeterinary sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Complex Diseases ofVeterinary sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBacterial densities likely fluctuate during infection and may exceed the bacterial density used in susceptibility testing. As such, investigation of bacterial killing by antibiotics over a range of varying bacterial densities may provide important differences between compounds and could impact drug selection for therapy. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesTo measure killing of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefazolin, cefovecin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin at clinically relevant (minimum inhibitory, mutant prevention, maximum serum and maximum tissue) drug concentrations against varying densities of bacteria. ANIMALS/MATERIALS: Bacterial strains collected from dogs with urinary tract infections were studied. METHODS AND MATERIALS: High bacterial densities ranging from 10
resultsDoxycycline exhibited bacteriostatic properties with less killing than the other three agents. For example, at a 10 CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Differences were seen between some drugs in the speed and extent of bacterial killing; this could be clinically important and may impact drug selection and length of therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.