Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31825016›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2019

Using word embeddings to expand terminology of dietary supplements on clinical notes.

Yadan Fan, Serguei Pakhomov, Reed McEwan, Wendi Zhao, Elizabeth Lindemann, Rui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Annotating Music Therapy, Chiropractic and Aquatic Exercise Using Electronic Health Record.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. iDISK: the integrated DIetary Supplements Knowledge base.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yadan FanInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Serguei PakhomovInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Reed McEwanAcademic Health Center-Information Systems, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Wendi ZhaoInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Elizabeth LindemannDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Rui ZhangInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
A Translational Informatics Framework to Mine Efficacy and Safety of Dietary SupplementsR01AT009457 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RUI ZHANG · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of applying word embeddings to expand the terminology of dietary supplements (DS) using over 26 million clinical notes.

methodsWord embedding models (ie, word2vec and GloVe) trained on clinical notes were used to predefine a list of top 40 semantically related terms for each of 14 commonly used DS. Each list was further evaluated by experts to generate semantically similar terms. We investigated the effect of corpus size and other settings (ie, vector size and window size) as well as the 2 word embedding models on performance for DS term expansion. We compared the number of clinical notes (and patients they represent) that were retrieved using the word embedding expanded terms to both the baseline terms and external DS sources exandped terms.

resultsUsing the word embedding models trained on clinical notes, we could identify 1-12 semantically similar terms for each DS. Using the word embedding exandped terms, we were able to retrieve averagely 8.39% more clinical notes and 11.68% more patients for each DS compared with 2 sets of terms. The increasing corpus size results in more misspellings, but not more semantic variants brand names. Word2vec model is also found more capable of detecting semantically similar terms than GloVe.

conclusionOur study demonstrates the utility of word embeddings on clinical notes for terminology expansion on 14 DS. We propose that this method can be potentially applied to create a DS vocabulary for downstream applications, such as information extraction.

Indexed as

clinical notesdietary supplementsnatural language processingterminology expansionword embeddings

Identifiers

PMID31825016
PMCPMC6904105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.