ArticleCureus2019
A Bundled Approach to Pulmonary Tuberculosis Testing: Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre in South India.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- The value of LAM and LprG in extracellular vesicles in the diagnostic and therapeutic field of renal tuberculosis.Frontiers in tuberculosis · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is based on a stepwise approach consisting of sputum microscopy and molecular testing (GeneXpert), with the use of Mycobacterium culture in select cases. We analysed a bundled approach of PTB testing, consisting of all three of these tests during the patient's first visit, for all patients fitting into the clinical criteria of PTB. We retrospectively analysed the medical records of all patients who underwent the TB diagnosis bundle during a period of 29 months. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of sputum microscopy and GeneXpert were compared against the gold standard of Mycobacterium culture. The incremental yield of diagnosing PTB by addition of Mycobacterium culture in the diagnostic bundle during the initial testing was also calculated. The bundled approach conferred an advantage in terms of faster clinical decision and increased diagnosis rates, by virtue of the speed of smear microscopy and GeneXpert, combined with the higher sensitivity of culture. The bundle also had the additional benefit of detecting non-tuberculous Mycobacterium (NTM) by the culture method. Hence we feel that the bundled approach ensures fewer number of hospital visits and reduces the potential delays in a clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.