Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31824734›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2019

Usage frequency and lexical class determine the evolution of kinship terms in Indo-European.

Péter Rácz, Sam Passmore, Catherine Sheard, Fiona M Jordan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Logical word learning: The case of kinship.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022
    Review
  4. The forms and meanings of grammatical markers support efficient communication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Péter RáczCognitive Development Center, Central European University, Budapest 1051, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-7896-4801
Sam PassmoreDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5302-356X
Catherine SheardSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8259-1275
Fiona M JordanDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9953-8884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Languages do not replace their vocabularies at an even rate: words endure longer if they are used more frequently. This effect, which has parallels in evolutionary biology, has been demonstrated for the core vocabulary, a set of common, unrelated meanings. The extent to which it replicates in closed lexical classes remains to be seen, and may indicate how general this effect is in language change. Here, we use phylogenetic comparative methods to investigate the history of 10 kinship categories, a type of closed lexical class of content words, across 47 Indo-European languages. We find that their rate of replacement is correlated with their usage frequency, and this relationship is stronger than in the case of the core vocabulary, even though the envelope of variation is comparable across the two cases. We also find that the residual variation in the rate of replacement of kinship terms is related to genealogical distance of referent to kin. We argue that this relationship is the result of social changes and corresponding shifts in the entire semantic class of kinship terms, shifts typically not present in the core vocabulary. Thus, an understanding of the scope and limits of social change is needed to understand changes in kinship systems, and broader context is necessary to model cultural evolution in particular and the process of system change in general.

Indexed as

cultural evolutionkinship systemslanguage changelanguage use

Identifiers

PMID31824734
PMCPMC6837234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.