ArticleF1000Research2019
A survey exploring biomedical editors' perceptions of editorial interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines.
Article in F1000Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2020Trial
- SPIRIT-CONSORT-ELM: Element-Level Annotated Dataset and Large Language Model Approach for Assessing Randomized Controlled Trial Reporting.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A survey of experts to identify methods to detect problematic studies: Stage 1 of the INSPECT-SR Project.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Endorsements of five reporting guidelines for biomedical research by journals of prominent publishers.PloS one · 2024Article
- A survey exploring biomedical editors' perceptions of editorial interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines.F1000Research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.