Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31824521›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2019

Emergent Ascomycetes in Viticulture: An Interdisciplinary Overview.

Carlotta Pirrello, Chiara Mizzotti, Tiago C Tomazetti, Monica Colombo, Paola Bettinelli, Daniele Prodorutti, Elisa Peressotti, Luca Zulini, Marco Stefanini, Gino Angeli and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Leaf Spot Caused byPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. An effector ofHorticulture research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genomic clustering within functionally related gene families inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Carlotta PirrelloResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Chiara MizzottiDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Tiago C TomazettiCenter of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Rodovia Admar Gonzaga, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Monica ColomboResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Paola BettinelliResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Daniele ProdoruttiTechnology Transfer Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Elisa PeressottiResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Luca ZuliniResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Marco StefaniniResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Gino AngeliTechnology Transfer Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Simona MasieroDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Leocir J WelterDepartment of Natural and Social Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Campus of Curitibanos, Rodovia Ulysses Gaboardi, Curitibanos, Brazil.
Ludger HausmannJulius Kühn Institute (JKI), Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, Siebeldingen, Germany.
Silvia VezzulliResearch and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reduction of pesticide usage is a current imperative and the implementation of sustainable viticulture is an urgent necessity. A potential solution, which is being increasingly adopted, is offered by the use of grapevine cultivars resistant to its main pathogenic threats. This, however, has contributed to changes in defense strategies resulting in the occurrence of secondary diseases, which were previously controlled. Concomitantly, the ongoing climate crisis is contributing to destabilizing the increasingly dynamic viticultural context. In this review, we explore the available knowledge on three Ascomycetes which are considered emergent and causal agents of powdery mildew, black rot and anthracnose. We also aim to provide a survey on methods for phenotyping disease symptoms in fields, greenhouse and lab conditions, and for disease control underlying the insurgence of pathogen resistance to fungicide. Thus, we discuss fungal genetic variability, highlighting the usage and development of molecular markers and barcoding, coupled with genome sequencing. Moreover, we extensively report on the current knowledge available on grapevine-ascomycete interactions, as well as the mechanisms developed by the host to counteract the attack. Indeed, to better understand these resistance mechanisms, it is relevant to identify pathogen effectors which are involved in the infection process and how grapevine resistance genes function and impact the downstream cascade. Dealing with such a wealth of information on both pathogens and the host, the horizon is now represented by multidisciplinary approaches, combining traditional and innovative methods of cultivation. This will support the translation from theory to practice, in an attempt to understand biology very deeply and manage the spread of these Ascomycetes.

Indexed as

anthracnoseblack rotdisease resistance locidisease symptom phenotypinggenetic diversitygrapevinepowdery mildewtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID31824521
PMCPMC6883492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.