Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31824371›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Orderliness/Disorderliness Is Mentally Associated With Construal Level and Psychological Distance.

Kaiyun Li, Yingqi Lv, Yingchao Dong, Tianze Wang, Jiayi Wu, Zhenxing Zhang, Xinrui Li, Ruikang Han, Fengxun Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kaiyun LiSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.
Yingqi LvSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.
Yingchao DongSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.
Tianze WangSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.
Jiayi WuSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.
Zhenxing ZhangSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.
Xinrui LiSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.
Ruikang HanSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.
Fengxun LinSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People are innately capable of exploring and detecting orderliness and of attempting to make the world in which they live more orderly rather than more disorderly. Construal level theory asserts that the same stimuli can be represented abstractly or concretely and that psychological distance can affect the construal level. No research, however, has examined whether perceived orderliness/disorderliness is mentally associated with construal level and psychological distance. In this study, by using the Implicit Association Test (IAT), we conducted 10 studies to examine this possibility. The results of studies 1A-1B showed that people tended to associate high-level construal concepts with orderliness concepts and low-level construal concepts with disorderliness concepts. By contrast, the results of studies 2A-5B revealed that people associated psychologically proximal concepts with orderliness concepts and psychologically distal concepts with disorderliness concepts. These studies demonstrated that orderliness/disorderliness is associated with both construal level and psychological distance, but in opposite directions, suggesting that construal level and psychological distance may have distinct natures.

Indexed as

construal leveldisorderlinessIATorderlinesspsychological distance

Identifiers

PMID31824371
PMCPMC6880731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.