ArticleNeural regeneration research2020
Time course analysis of sensory axon regeneration
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Most current studies quantify axon regeneration by immunostaining regeneration-associated proteins, representing indirect measurement of axon lengths from both sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglia and motor neurons in the spinal cord. Our recently developed method of in vivo electroporation of plasmid DNA encoding for enhanced green fluorescent protein into adult sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglia provides a way to directly and specifically measure regenerating sensory axon lengths in whole-mount nerves. A mouse model of sciatic nerve compression was established by squeezing the sciatic nerve with tweezers. Plasmid DNA carrying enhanced green fluorescent protein was transfected by ipsilateral dorsal root ganglion electroporation 2 or 3 days before injury. Fluorescence distribution of dorsal root or sciatic nerve was observed by confocal microscopy. At 12 and 18 hours, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 days of injury, lengths of regenerated axons after sciatic nerve compression were measured using green fluorescence images. Apoptosis-related protein caspase-3 expression in dorsal root ganglia was determined by western blot assay. We found that in vivo electroporation did not affect caspase-3 expression in dorsal root ganglia. Dorsal root ganglia and sciatic nerves were successfully removed and subjected to a rapid tissue clearing technique. Neuronal soma in dorsal root ganglia expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein or fluorescent dye-labeled microRNAs were imaged after tissue clearing. The results facilitate direct time course analysis of peripheral nerve axon regeneration. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Guilin Medical University, China (approval No. GLMC201503010) on March 7, 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.