Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31823809›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2019

Accuracy, robustness and scalability of dimensionality reduction methods for single-cell RNA-seq analysis.

Shiquan Sun, Jiaqiang Zhu, Ying Ma, Xiang Zhou

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. DeepAtlas: a tool for effective manifold learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shiquan SunSchool of Computer Science, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710072, People's Republic of China.
Jiaqiang ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Ying MaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Xiang ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. xzhousph@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4331-7599

Funding

Statistical Methods for Modeling Polygenic Architecture in Association and Re-sequencing StudiesR01HG009124 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Xiang Zhou · 2017 to 2026
$3.0M
New directions in single cell genomics method developmentR01GM126553 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Mengjie Chen · 2017 to 2026
$2.9M
Scalable and Translational Analysis Tools on the Cloud for Deep Integrative Omics DataU01HL137182 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHOU, XIANG · 2017 to 2019
$1.6M
Develop new bioinformatics infrastructures and computational tools for epitranscriptomics dataR01HG012927 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Mengjie Chen · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009124NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012927NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL137182NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126553the National Institutes of Health R01GM126553the National Institutes of Health R01HD088558the National Institutes of Health R01HG009124the National Institutes of Health U01HL137182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDimensionality reduction is an indispensable analytic component for many areas of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis. Proper dimensionality reduction can allow for effective noise removal and facilitate many downstream analyses that include cell clustering and lineage reconstruction. Unfortunately, despite the critical importance of dimensionality reduction in scRNA-seq analysis and the vast number of dimensionality reduction methods developed for scRNA-seq studies, few comprehensive comparison studies have been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of different dimensionality reduction methods in scRNA-seq.

resultsWe aim to fill this critical knowledge gap by providing a comparative evaluation of a variety of commonly used dimensionality reduction methods for scRNA-seq studies. Specifically, we compare 18 different dimensionality reduction methods on 30 publicly available scRNA-seq datasets that cover a range of sequencing techniques and sample sizes. We evaluate the performance of different dimensionality reduction methods for neighborhood preserving in terms of their ability to recover features of the original expression matrix, and for cell clustering and lineage reconstruction in terms of their accuracy and robustness. We also evaluate the computational scalability of different dimensionality reduction methods by recording their computational cost.

conclusionsBased on the comprehensive evaluation results, we provide important guidelines for choosing dimensionality reduction methods for scRNA-seq data analysis. We also provide all analysis scripts used in the present study at www.xzlab.org/reproduce.html.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisCluster AnalysisDimensional Measurement Accuracy

Identifiers

PMID31823809
PMCPMC6902413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.