Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31823789›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2019

Enolase and dipeptidyl peptidase IV protein sub-unit vaccines are not protective against a lethal Streptococcus suis serotype 2 challenge in a mouse model of infection.

Audrey Dumesnil, Léa Martelet, Daniel Grenier, Jean-Philippe Auger, Josée Harel, Eric Nadeau, Marcelo Gottschalk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Population Genetic Architecture of theVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. An Engineered Outer Membrane-DefectiveJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  6. Enolase ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Audrey DumesnilGroupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses en production animale (GREMIP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, 3200 Sicotte St.,, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, J2S 2M2, Canada.
Léa MarteletGroupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses en production animale (GREMIP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, 3200 Sicotte St.,, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, J2S 2M2, Canada.
Daniel GrenierSwine and Poultry Infectious Diseases Research Center (CRIPA), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Philippe AugerGroupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses en production animale (GREMIP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, 3200 Sicotte St.,, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, J2S 2M2, Canada.
Josée HarelGroupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses en production animale (GREMIP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, 3200 Sicotte St.,, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, J2S 2M2, Canada.
Eric NadeauPrevtec Microbia Inc. 3395 Casavant W. Blvd, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, J2S 0B8, Canada.
Marcelo GottschalkGroupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses en production animale (GREMIP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, 3200 Sicotte St.,, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, J2S 2M2, Canada. marcelo.gottschalk@umontreal.ca.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 468787-14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStreptococcus suis is a major swine pathogen causing arthritis, meningitis and sudden death in post-weaning piglets and is also a zoonotic agent. S. suis comprises 35 different serotypes of which the serotype 2 is the most prevalent in both pigs and humans. In the absence of commercial vaccines, bacterins (mostly autogenous), are used in the field, with controversial results. In the past years, the focus has turned towards the development of sub-unit vaccine candidates. However, published results are sometimes contradictory regarding the protective effect of a same candidate. Moreover, the adjuvant used may significantly influence the protective capacity of a given antigen. This study focused on two protective candidates, the dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) and the enolase (SsEno). Both proteins are involved in S. suis pathogenesis, and while contradictory protection results have been obtained with SsEno in the past, no data on the protective capacity of DPPIV was available.

resultsResults showed that among all the field strains tested, 86 and 88% were positive for the expression of the SsEno and DPPIV proteins, respectively, suggesting that they are widely expressed by strains of different serotypes. However, no protection was obtained after two vaccine doses in a CD-1 mouse model of infection, regardless of the use of four different adjuvants. Even though no protection was obtained, significant amounts of antibodies were produced against both antigens, and this regardless of the adjuvant used.

conclusionsTaken together, these results demonstrate that S. suis DPPIV and SsEno are probably not good vaccine candidates, at least not in the conditions evaluated in this study. Further studies in the natural host (pig) should still be carried out. Moreover, this work highlights the importance of confirming results obtained by different research groups.

Indexed as

Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4Phosphopyruvate HydrataseAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialDisease Models, AnimalMiceProtein SubunitsStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcal VaccinesStreptococcus suisVaccines, SubunitAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, BacterialDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Phosphopyruvate HydrataseProtein SubunitsStreptococcal VaccinesVaccines, SubunitAntibody productionExperimental design, biasMouse modelProtectionStreptococcus suis serotype 2Sub-unit vaccines

Identifiers

PMID31823789
PMCPMC6905021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.