Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31823754›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2019

Diazepam and ethanol differently modulate neuronal activity in organotypic cortical cultures.

Matthias Kreuzer, Paul S García, Verena Brucklacher-Waldert, Rebecca Claassen, Gerhard Schneider, Bernd Antkowiak, Berthold Drexler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Changes in processing speed during early abstinence from alcohol dependence.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Matthias KreuzerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Paul S GarcíaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Neuroanesthesia Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA.
Verena Brucklacher-WaldertDept. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Experimental Anesthesiology Section, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Rebecca ClaassenDept. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Experimental Anesthesiology Section, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Gerhard SchneiderDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Bernd AntkowiakDept. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Experimental Anesthesiology Section, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Berthold DrexlerDept. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Experimental Anesthesiology Section, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. berthold.drexler@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7202-1511
University Children's Hospital Tübingen · DETUM Klinikum · DEHorizon Discovery (United Kingdom) · GBNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pharmacodynamic results of diazepam and ethanol administration are similar, in that each can mediate amnestic and sedative-hypnotic effects. Although each of these molecules effectively reduce the activity of central neurons, diazepam does so through modulation of a more specific set of receptor targets (GABA

methodWe used electrophysiological recordings from organotypic slice cultures derived from Sprague-Dawley rat neocortex. We exposed these cultures to either diazepam (15 and 30 µM, n = 7) or ethanol (30 and 60 mM, n = 11) and recorded the electrical activity at baseline and experimental conditions. For analysis, we extracted the episodes of spontaneous activity, i.e., cortical up-states. After separation of action potential and local field potential (LFP) activity, we looked at differences in the number of action potentials, in the spectral power of the LFP, as well as in the coupling between action potential and LFP phase.

resultsWhile both substances seem to decrease neocortical action potential firing in a not significantly different (p = 0.659, Mann-Whitney U) fashion, diazepam increases the spectral power of the up-state without significantly impacting the spectral composition, whereas ethanol does not significantly change the spectral power but the oscillatory architecture of the up-state as revealed by the Friedman test with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05). Further, the action potential to LFP-phase coupling reveals a synchronizing effect of diazepam for a wide frequency range and a narrow-band de-synchronizing effect for ethanol (p < 0.05, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test).

conclusionDiazepam and ethanol, induce specific patterns of network depressant actions. Diazepam induces cortical network inhibition and increased synchronicity via gamma subunit containing GABA

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCentral Nervous System DepressantsDiazepamEthanolFemaleGABA ModulatorsMaleNeocortexNeuronsRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue Culture TechniquesCentral Nervous System DepressantsDiazepamEthanolGABA ModulatorsBenzodiazepinesDiazepamEthanolGABAA receptorsNeocortex

Identifiers

PMID31823754
PMCPMC6902402
OpenAlexW2996156819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.