Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31823737›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2019

Epidemiology and health care utilization of patients suffering from Huntington's disease in Germany: real world evidence based on German claims data.

Christoph Ohlmeier, Kai-Uwe Saum, Wolfgang Galetzka, Dominik Beier, Holger Gothe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence and Incidence of Huntington's Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christoph OhlmeierIGES Institut GmbH, Friedrichstraße 180, 10117, Berlin, Germany. christoph.ohlmeier@iges.com.
Kai-Uwe SaumRoche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.
Wolfgang GaletzkaInGef - Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Dominik BeierInGef - Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Holger GotheIGES Institut GmbH, Friedrichstraße 180, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Institute for Applied Economic Research · DEIGES Institut · DERoche Pharma AG (Germany) · DEUMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik · AT

Funding

Roche Pharma AG Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuntington's disease (HD) is a rare, genetic, neurodegenerative and ultimately fatal disease with no cure or progression-delaying treatment currently available. HD is characterized by a triad of cognitive, behavioural and motor symptoms. Evidence on epidemiology and management of HD is limited, especially for Germany. This study aims to estimate the incidence and prevalence of HD and analyze the current routine care based on German claims data.

methodsThe source of data was a sample of the Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin (InGef) Research Database, comprising data of approximately four million insured persons from approximately 70 German statutory health insurances. The study was conducted in a retrospective cross-sectional design using 2015 and 2016 as a two-year observation period. At least two outpatient or inpatient ICD-10 codes for HD (ICD-10: G10) during the study period were required for case identification. Patients were considered incident if no HD diagnoses in the 4 years prior to the year of case identification were documented. Information on outpatient drug dispensations, medical aids and remedies were considered to describe the current treatment situation of HD patients.

resultsA 2-year incidence of 1.8 per 100,000 persons (95%-Confidence interval (CI): 1.4-2.4) and a 2-year period prevalence of 9.3 per 100,000 persons (95%-CI: 8.3-10.4) was observed. The prevalence of HD increased with advancing age, peaking at 60-69 years (16.8 per 100,000 persons; 95%-CI: 13.4-21.0) and decreasing afterwards. The most frequently observed comorbidities and disease-associated symptoms in HD patients were depression (42.9%), dementia (37.7%), urinary incontinence (32.5%), extrapyramidal and movement disorders (30.5%), dysphagia (28.6%) and disorders of the lipoprotein metabolism (28.2%). The most common medications in HD patients were antipsychotics (66.9%), followed by antidepressants (45.1%). Anticonvulsants (16.6%), opioids (14.6%) and hypnotics (9.7%) were observed less frequently. Physical therapy was the most often used medical aid in HD patients (46.4%). Nursing services and speech therapy were used by 27.9 and 22.7% of HD patients, respectively, whereas use of psychotherapy was rare (3.2%).

conclusionsBased on a representative sample, this study provides new insights into the epidemiology and routine care of HD patients in Germany, and thus, may serve as a starting point for further research.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualDelivery of Health CareDisease ProgressionFemaleGermanyHumansHuntington DiseaseIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareClaims data analysisEpidemiologyGermanyHealth care utilizationHuntington’s diseaseIncidencePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID31823737
PMCPMC6905058
OpenAlexW2995414847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.