ReviewClinical cardiology2020
Cardiac rehabilitation in older adults: New options.
Review in Clinical cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smartphone-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Improves Functional Capacity in Coronary Heart Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global heart · 2023Pooled it
- Outcomes of a smartphone-based application with live health-coaching post-percutaneous coronary intervention.EBioMedicine · 2021Trial
- Evaluating the Efficacy and Impact of Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Physical performance on the early 6-minute walk test in coronary artery bypass grafting patients during inpatient cardiac rehabilitation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Feasibility and effectiveness of cardiac telerehabilitation for older adults with coronary heart disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Effects of an Enhanced Strength Training Program in Remote Cardiological Rehabilitation: A Shift from Aerobic Dominance-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Six-minute walk test distance at time of hospital discharge is strongly and independently associated with all-cause mortality following cardiac surgery.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Home-based cardiac rehabilitation in older adults: expert-recommendations for physiotherapist-led care to improve daily physical functioning and reduce comorbidity-related barriers.European journal of physiotherapy · 2024Article
- Targeting behavioral factors with digital health and shared decision-making to promote cardiac rehabilitation-a narrative review.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Review
- Impact of a history of cardiovascular disease and physical activity habits on the incidence of functional disability.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Adherence of Older Cardiac Patients to a Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Cardio4Health Study, a Cardiac Telerehabilitation Pilot Program Aimed at Patients After an Ischemic Event: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR cardio · 2023Article
- Virtual healthcare solutions for cardiac rehabilitation: a literature review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2023Review
- Cardiovascular prevention in elderly patients.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2022Article
- Promotion and maintenance of physically active lifestyle in older outpatients 2 years after acute coronary syndrome.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2022Article
- Frailty in Acute and Chronic Coronary Syndrome Patients Entering Cardiac Rehabilitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Cardiovascular rehabilitation in patients aged 70-year-old or older: benefits on functional capacity, physical activity and metabolic profile in youngerJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2020Article
- Cardiac rehabilitation in older adults: New options.Clinical cardiology · 2020Review
- Cardiac rehabilitation in older adults: Apropos yet significantly underutilized.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an important component in the continuum of care for patients with cardiovascular diseases, including the older population. Benefits of CR which include mortality benefit, decreased hospitalizations, increased functional capacity all extend to an older population. In Medicare beneficiaries which represent an older population, utilization of CR continues to remain low despite evidence that suggests lower hospitalization rates, Medicare costs, and improved symptoms. Given poor referral rates, enrollment rates, and completion rates, a call for new strategies has been made by all major societies. However, several barriers exist. Newer models of CR constructed to overcome these barriers are reviewed below. Some of these new strategies include alternative site CR or home-based CR and the utilization of technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.