ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2017
Does socio-economic status or having a chronic condition affect whether family physicians accept a new patient? A Nova Scotia population study.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do Socioeconomic Factors Influence Knowledge, Attitudes, and Representations of End-of-Life Practices? A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of palliative care · 2025Article
- Access to episodic primary care: a cross-sectional comparison of walk-in clinics and urgent primary care centers in British Columbia.Primary health care research & development · 2023Article
- Telephone outreach by volunteer navigators: a theory-based evaluation of an intervention to improve access to appropriate primary care.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- "A Band-Aid Solution": Policy Maker and Primary Care Provider Perspectives on the Value of Attachment Incentives.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2023Article
- Accepting new patients who require opioids into family practice: results from the MAAP-NS census survey study.BMC family practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine whether socio-economic status (SES) and presence of a chronic condition are associated with the response a prospective patient receives when seeking a family physician (FP).
methodsScripted telephone calls (indicating higher or lower SES and presence or absence of a chronic condition) were made to all 327 FP offices in Nova Scotia (NS) requesting an appointment. The main outcome measures were the responses to callers seeking a FP: being accepted for an appointment or being offered further assistance if not accepted (e.g., walk-in clinic, alternative provider, and telehealth), as well as the callers' perception of the experience as positive, negative, or neutral.
resultsOnly 9.9% of offices accepted callers as new patients. There were no statistically significant differences by SES or chronic condition in the proportion of calls resulting in an appointment. Callers indicating high SES were more likely to be provided further assistance than those with low SES (p = 0.06), and callers indicating a chronic condition reported a better overall experience than those without (p = 0.03).
conclusionFirst contact accessibility for prospective new patients was low across NS. Lower SES was associated with fewer offers of additional assistance than higher SES. This is particularly troubling since those with lower SES may need additional support as they may have less access to resources and networks that could provide support. This study signals the need to improve general and equitable accessibility to primary care providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.