Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31823249›Full record

ArticlePituitary2020

Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly in a clinical practice setting in Spain: the ACROPRAXIS program Delphi survey.

Pedro de Pablos-Velasco, Eva María Venegas, Cristina Álvarez Escolá, Carmen Fajardo, Paz de Miguel, Natividad González, Ignacio Bernabéu, Nuria Valdés, Miguel Paja, Juan José Díez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Acromegaly among a Moroccan population.The Pan African medical journal · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. The Biochemical Diagnosis of Acromegaly.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pedro de Pablos-VelascoEndocrinology Service, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, C/Barranco de la Ballena, s/n, 35010, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. pablos.velasco@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9190-2581
Eva María VenegasEndocrinology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Cristina Álvarez EscoláEndocrinology Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen FajardoEndocrinology Service, Hospital Universitario de La Ribera, Valencia, Spain.
Paz de MiguelEndocrinology Service, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Natividad GonzálezEndocrinology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Ignacio BernabéuEndocrinology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Nuria ValdésEndocrinology Service, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Miguel PajaEndocrinology Service, Hospital Universitario de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain.
Juan José DíezEndocrinology Service, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Betina BiagettiEndocrinology Service, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe ACROPRAXIS program aims to describe the management of acromegaly in Spain and provide guidance.

methodsNinety-three endocrinologists were organized into 13 panels to discuss the practical issues in managing acromegaly. Based on the key learnings, an online Delphi survey with 62 statements was performed, so those statements achieving consensus could be used as guidance. Statements were rated on a 9-point scale (9, full agreement; consensus > 66.6% of response in the same tertile).

resultsNinety-two endocrinologists (98.8%) answered two rounds of the survey (mean age 47.6 years; 59.8% women; median 18.5 years of experience). Consensus was achieved for 49 (79%) statements. DIAGNOSIS: The levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGFI) is the preferred screening test. If IGFI levels 1-1.3 ULN, the test is repeated and growth hormone (GH) after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is assessed. A pituitary magnetic resonance is performed after biochemical diagnosis. TREATMENT: Surgery is the first treatment choice for patients with microadenoma or macroadenoma with/without optical pathway compression. Pre-surgical somatostatin analogues (SSA) are indicated when surgery is delayed and/or to reduce anaesthesia-associated risks. After unsuccessful surgery, reintervention is performed if the residual tumor is resectable, while if non-resectable, SSA are administered. Follow-up First biochemical and clinical controls are performed 1-3 months after surgery. Disease remission is considered if random GH levels are < 1 µg/L or OGTT is < 1 or ≤ 0.4 µg/L, depending on the assay's sensitivity.

conclusionCurrent clinical management for acromegaly is homogeneous across Spain and generally follows clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdolescentAdultChildEndocrinologistsFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestGrowth HormoneHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleMiddle AgedSomatostatinSpainYoung AdultGrowth HormoneIGF1 protein, humanInsulin-Like Growth Factor ISomatostatinAcromegalyClinical practiceGuidelinesPatient management

Identifiers

PMID31823249
PMCPMC7066268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.