Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31823233›Full record

SynthesisJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2020

Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures-systematic review and meta-analysis.

Péter Kupó, Róbert Pap, László Sághy, Dalma Tényi, Alexandra Bálint, Dorottya Debreceni, Indranill Basu-Ray, András Komócsi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Randomized prospective evaluation of same-day discharge after cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: results of the EASY PVI study.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Same-day discharge after electrophysiological and cardiac implantable electronic device procedures: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions (ACNAP) of the ESC.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Evolution of leadless pacemaker technology.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Ultrasound-guided femoral venipuncture for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Forearm access for carotid artery stenting using the dual protection of flow reversal and distal filter: Trans-forearm dual protection technique.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Péter KupóHeart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Ifjúság útja 13, Pécs, H-7624, Hungary. peter.kupo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9422-4245
Róbert PapSecond Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Centre, Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
László SághySecond Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Centre, Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Dalma TényiDepartment of Neurology, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Alexandra BálintHeart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Ifjúság útja 13, Pécs, H-7624, Hungary.
Dorottya DebreceniHeart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Ifjúság útja 13, Pécs, H-7624, Hungary.
Indranill Basu-RaySt. Francis Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
András KomócsiHeart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Ifjúság útja 13, Pécs, H-7624, Hungary.

Funding

Hungarian Goverment GINOP-2.3.3-15-2016-00031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe most common complications of electrophysiology (EP) procedures are related to vascular access. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis comparing ultrasound (US)-guided vs. palpation-based technique for femoral venous access in EP procedures.

methodsElectronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing femoral vein puncture with/without US in EP procedures. The primary outcome was the rate of major vascular complications; secondary outcomes were minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time. Predefined subgroup analysis was conducted separately for patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation procedure (PVI). A random-effects model was used to derive risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsNine studies involving 8232 patients met our inclusion criteria. Compared with the standard technique, the use of US reduced major vascular complications (from 2.01 to 0.71%, p < 0.0001). The rate of minor vascular complications (RR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.14-0.62, p = 0.001) and inadvertent artery puncture were lower with US-guided puncture (RR = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.17-0.58, p = 0.0003). Puncture time was shorter (mean difference = - 92.1 s, 95% CI, - 142.12 - - 42.07 s, p = 0.0003) and postprocedural groin pain was less frequent (RR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.41-0.79, p = 0.0008) in the US group. Subgroup analysis of patients undergoing PVI also showed significant reduction of major vascular complications (RR = 0.27, 95% CI, 0.12-0.64, p = 0.003) and inadvertent artery puncture (RR = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.21-0.59, p < 0.0001).

conclusionReal-time US-guidance of femoral vein puncture in EP procedures is beneficial: it reduces major and minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time.

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralCardiac ElectrophysiologyFemoral ArteryHumansPuncturesUltrasonography, InterventionalComplicationsElectrophysiology proceduresPulmonary vein isolationUltrasound-guided punctureVascular access

Identifiers

PMID31823233
PMCPMC7591449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.