Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31823216›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2020

Brief Report: Perceived Evidence and Use of Autism Intervention Strategies in Early Intervention Providers.

Jessica Paynter, Sarah Luskin-Saxby, Deb Keen, Kathryn Fordyce, Grace Frost, Christine Imms, Scott Miller, Rebecca Sutherland, David Trembath, Madonna Tucker and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice in autism: a mini-review.Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica PaynterMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia. j.paynter@griffith.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0130-0606
Sarah Luskin-SaxbyMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.
Deb KeenAutism Centre of Excellence, School of Education and Professional Studies, Griffith University, Messines Ridge Road, Mt Gravatt, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Kathryn FordyceSt Giles Society, Level 1 34 Alexander Street, Burnie, 7320, Australia.
Grace FrostAnglicare South Australia, 26 Daphne Street, Prospect, SA, 5082, Australia.
Christine ImmsAustralian Catholic University, Level 2 Daniel Mannix Building, 17 Young Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
Scott MillerAutism Association of Western Australia, 215 Stubbs Terrace, Shenton Park, WA, 6008, Australia.
Rebecca SutherlandMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.
David TrembathMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.
Madonna TuckerAEIOU Foundation, 3 Balaclava St, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Ullrich EckerUniversity of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, 6009, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council DP160103596National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1071811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of empirically unsupported practices is a challenge in the field of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We explored whether attitudes and perceived evidence were linked to intended practice use in early intervention staff. Seventy-one participants completed ratings of the evidence base, current and future use of six ASD intervention practices, and reported attitudes to research and evidence-based practice. Participants reported greater use and rated the evidence base higher for the empirically supported practices. However, variability in accuracy of evidence base ratings was observed across individuals. Higher perceived evidence was linked to greater future use intentions for empirically supported and unsupported practices. The need for accurate information across practice types is highlighted. Self-report methodology limitations and future research directions are discussed.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAutism Spectrum DisorderEarly Intervention, EducationalEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansMaleAutism spectrum disorderDebunkingEvidence-based practiceKnowledge translationMisinformation

Identifiers

PMID31823216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.