Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31823165›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2020

Characterization of MGMT and EGFR protein expression in glioblastoma and association with survival.

Lauren R Schaff, Dongyao Yan, Sheeno Thyparambil, Yuan Tian, Fabiola Cecchi, Marc Rosenblum, Anne S Reiner, Katherine S Panageas, Todd Hembrough, Andrew L Lin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Biomedicines · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren R SchaffDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. schaffl@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4664-670X
Dongyao YanNantOmics, Culver City, CA, 90230, USA.
Sheeno ThyparambilNantOmics, Culver City, CA, 90230, USA.
Yuan TianNantOmics, Culver City, CA, 90230, USA.
Fabiola CecchiNantOmics, Culver City, CA, 90230, USA.
Marc RosenblumDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0530-0155
Anne S ReinerDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1258-6112
Katherine S PanageasDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Todd HembroughNantOmics, Culver City, CA, 90230, USA.
Andrew L LinDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0659-261X
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnderstanding the molecular landscape of glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly important in the age of targeted therapy. O-6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and EGFR amplification are markers that may play a role in prognostication, treatment, and/or clinical trial eligibility. Quantification of MGMT and EGFR protein expression may offer an alternative strategy towards understanding GBM. Here, we quantify baseline expression of MGMT and EGFR protein in newly diagnosed GBM samples using mass spectrometry. We correlate findings with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification statuses and survival.

methodsWe retrospectively identified adult patients with newly diagnosed resected GBM. MGMT and EGFR protein expression were quantified using a selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry assay. Protein levels were correlated with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification and survival data.

resultsWe found a statistically significant association between MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation status (p = 0.02) as well as between EGFR protein expression and EGFR amplification (p < 0.0001). EGFR protein expression and amplification were more tightly associated than MGMT protein expression and methylation. Only MGMT promoter methylation was statistically significantly associated with progression-free and overall survival.

conclusionsUnlike EGFR protein expression and EGFR amplification which are strongly associated, only a weak association was seen between MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation. Quantification of MGMT protein expression was inferior to MGMT methylation for prognostication in GBM. Discordance was observed between EGFR amplification and EGFR protein expression; additional study is warranted to determine whether EGFR protein expression is a better biomarker than EGFR amplification for clinical decisions and trial enrollment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesErbB ReceptorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsMGMT protein, humanTemozolomideTumor Suppressor ProteinsEGFRGlioblastomaMass spectrometryMGMTProteomics

Identifiers

PMID31823165
PMCPMC6939885
OpenAlexW2996674223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.