ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2020
Characterization of MGMT and EGFR protein expression in glioblastoma and association with survival.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Antitumor Activity of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Pediatric Solid Tumors with Variable HER2 Expression.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2026Article
- Targeted Fluoxetine Delivery Using Folic Acid-Modified PLGA Nanoparticles for Selective Uptake by Glioblastoma Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Molecular Characteristics of High-Grade Glioma in Relation to 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (5-ALA) Fluorescence Intensity.Cureus · 2025Article
- Potential Diagnostic and Clinical Significance of Selected Genetic Alterations in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- New Avenues and Major Achievements in Phytocompounds Research for Glioblastoma Therapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Dissecting the Methylomes ofCancers · 2023Article
- Gene Targets of CAR-T Cell Therapy for Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2023Review
- Nomogram Model for Predicting the Prognosis of High-Grade Glioma in Adults Receiving Standard Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Cost Matrix of Molecular Pathology in Glioma-Towards AI-Driven Rational Molecular Testing and Precision Care for the Future.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Impact of Rural vs. Urban Residence on Survival Rates of Patients with Glioblastoma: A Tertiary Care Center Experience.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- The Next Frontier in Health Disparities-A Closer Look at Exploring Sex Differences in Glioma Data and Omics Analysis, from Bench to Bedside and Back.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Article
- The diagnostic value of ADC histogram and direct ADC measurements for coexisting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation in glioma.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Review
- Molecular Biomarkers Predict Pathological Complete Response of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- The regulatory pattern of target gene expression by aberrant enhancer methylation in glioblastoma.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- DNA Repair Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets in Glioma.Current oncology reports · 2021Review
- Article
- Temozolomide: An Updated Overview of Resistance Mechanisms, Nanotechnology Advances and Clinical Applications.Current neuropharmacology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUnderstanding the molecular landscape of glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly important in the age of targeted therapy. O-6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and EGFR amplification are markers that may play a role in prognostication, treatment, and/or clinical trial eligibility. Quantification of MGMT and EGFR protein expression may offer an alternative strategy towards understanding GBM. Here, we quantify baseline expression of MGMT and EGFR protein in newly diagnosed GBM samples using mass spectrometry. We correlate findings with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification statuses and survival.
methodsWe retrospectively identified adult patients with newly diagnosed resected GBM. MGMT and EGFR protein expression were quantified using a selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry assay. Protein levels were correlated with MGMT methylation and EGFR amplification and survival data.
resultsWe found a statistically significant association between MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation status (p = 0.02) as well as between EGFR protein expression and EGFR amplification (p < 0.0001). EGFR protein expression and amplification were more tightly associated than MGMT protein expression and methylation. Only MGMT promoter methylation was statistically significantly associated with progression-free and overall survival.
conclusionsUnlike EGFR protein expression and EGFR amplification which are strongly associated, only a weak association was seen between MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation. Quantification of MGMT protein expression was inferior to MGMT methylation for prognostication in GBM. Discordance was observed between EGFR amplification and EGFR protein expression; additional study is warranted to determine whether EGFR protein expression is a better biomarker than EGFR amplification for clinical decisions and trial enrollment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.