Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31823122›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2020

Men's experiences of surviving testicular cancer: an integrated literature review.

Obrey Alexis, Adeniyi O Adeleye, Aaron James Worsley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring online discussions in men with testicular cancer: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of Reddit posts.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. "Uncovering the unspoken": a narrative analysis of patients' experiences with testicular cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  14. Humanistic nursing tailored to the needs of young men with cancer.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Psychological State and Decision Perceptions of Male and Female Cancer Patients on Fertility Preservation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Mental Health in Urologic Oncology.Health psychology research · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Obrey AlexisFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Adeniyi O AdeleyeSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Australia.
Aaron James WorsleyFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK. aworsley@brookes.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9102-8476
Oxford Brookes University · GBCentral Queensland University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo synthesise literature in order to elucidate the experiences of men who have survived testicular cancer and determine their quality of life following treatment.

methodsAn integrated review sought appropriate literature by utilising a keyword search across seven databases. Retrieved studies were appraised for quality, with 2 qualitative, 12 quantitative and 2 mixed method studies deemed appropriate for this review. The data were extracted and aggregated into categories by way of a thematic analysis. The themes were personal challenges and impact on health, psychological and emotive challenges, perception of reproduction and sexual changes and outlook and support.

resultsMen experienced physical, emotional and sexual difficulties. Some men believed they were infertile, despite evidence that fertility is not compromised in the long term. Psychological conditions can be exacerbated by cultural pressures to conceive and cultural expressions about male identity. Men who had undergone orchidectomy reported minimal impact on their mental health than the men who had chemotherapy or radiotherapy as part of their treatment modality. Sexual dysfunction caused by chemotherapy-associated side effects was detrimental to men's quality of life. In addition, men who had a partner, who were employed, and who had children were able to adjust better after treatment than those who did not. Provision of clear and honest information post-treatment helped testicular cancer survivors return to their normal lives.

conclusionsThe evidence from the review suggests that the burden of disease for testicular cancer survivors is overall low. Men who had surgical intervention and were treated for testicular cancer experienced minimal impact on their mental health status than the men who had chemotherapy or radiotherapy as part of their treatment modality. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: There is a need to provide appropriate referrals to the relevant services, including psychosocial support, and the development of more adequate communication resources for men following treatment for testicular cancer.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHumansMaleQuality of LifeTesticular NeoplasmsIntegrated reviewMasculinityMenQuality of lifeTesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID31823122
OpenAlexW2993627516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.